Home
/
Blog
/
Hiring Tools
/
3 types of online proctoring services and how to select the best for hiring

3 types of online proctoring services and how to select the best for hiring

Author
Madhukesh Gautam
Calendar Icon
December 20, 2017
Timer Icon
5 min read
Share

The exam hall is shrouded in silence, barring the abrasive scraping of pen on paper. A mere glance at the person sitting across you earns a pointy stare from the invigilator/proctor. With hawk-like eyes (most are believed to have those all-seeing-eyes at the back of their heads as well) she keeps everyone under her purview, flushing out the suspicious characters at first glance. Invigilators, or proctors, as they are called, are an irreplaceable feature of our traditional competitive examinations, critical to preserving its integrity. Or are they?

As with most things traditional, proctoring, too, is undergoing substantial transformation thanks to technological advancements. With online proctoringprogressively becoming mainstream, more and more educational institutions and companies are adopting online proctoring as opposed to the more traditional form of proctoring thanks to its many advantages. Some of the early adopters of online proctoring for their recruitment needs include companies such as Amazon, Walmart Labs, Cognizant, Honeywell, among several big and not-so-big companies.

What is online proctoring?

Online proctoring, similar to offline proctoring (or just your regular invigilation), is a service that safeguards the integrity of the exam undertaken by remotely monitoring (via a webcam) the activities of the candidate during the course of the examination.

To use an online proctored examination to spearhead your recruitment drive, the first step is to choose an online proctoring service provider that is right for you. Keeping in mind a few points would make it easier to choose. Specify what areas you want the candidate to be assessed on and the skill level that the position requires. It helps to understand how the proctoring works — is it manual or are the candidates’ activities recorded via their webcam? Ensure that the service you choose offers solutions to not only prevent cheating but check the authenticity of the candidate.

How does an online proctored exam work?

The candidates appearing for the online proctored examination are required to download the software application onto the device (laptop or desktop) that will be used for the purpose. When the candidate begins the examination, the application assesses his/her computer and webcam and a lockdown mechanism is used to prevent him/her from opening any web browsers. The candidate has to confirm his/her identity by one of the many methods that are required by the application. While few may require the candidate to show proof of identity to the camera, some others use facial recognition software to confirm the candidate’s identity. Certain others use advanced technology to further confirm the candidate’s identity by instructing him/her to type a certain phrase and then analyzing the keystrokes with previously submitted samples. Whatever the method employed, after confirming the candidate’s identity, the application requires the candidate to show around the room where the test takes place to confirm there is no one else to assist with the exam.

Once the exam begins, there are three ways in which online proctoring can take place: Live online proctoring, Recorded proctoring, and Advanced automated proctoring according to this guide.

Live online proctoring:

In this form of proctoring, a qualified proctor monitors the candidate as he/she is giving the exam through live audio and video feeds. These proctors are trained to ensure the authenticity of the candidate and look for any red flags such as suspicious eye or facial movements or the appearance of any unverified device that could indicate possible cheating. In case suspicious circumstances do arise, the proctor can either shut down the test or notify the company of the prohibited activity. This form of proctoring allows the proctor to monitor up to 32 (a standard number for most proctors) candidates at a time. Both the candidate and proctor can be in any location as long as they both have access to the internet. However, the only disadvantage of this kind of proctoring is that it is dependent on the availability of the proctor on a given date and time. It is also expensive since it needs human intervention just like offline proctoring and for the same reason is not scalable either.

Recorded proctoring:

Unlike live online proctoring, a recorded proctoring, as its name suggests, merely records the activities of the candidate during the examination, which is then played back by a proctor at the greater speed to look for any suspicious behavior or occurrence during the course of the exam. This form of proctoring has an advantage in that it requires no scheduling since the candidate can take the exam at any time convenient to him/her. But as this too requires human intervention for reviewing the clip, it is expensive and difficult to scale.

Advanced automated proctoring:

This is the most advanced form of proctoring (as the name suggests) and requires no manual intervention whatsoever. This form of proctoring records the activities of the candidate while also monitoring the feed for red flags of any sort that would indicate malpractice using advanced audio and video analytics. It is the least expensive of all these forms of proctoring since it eliminates the need for manual intervention and is scalable for the same reason.

Certain online proctors go a step further by limiting the candidate logins to specific IP addresses and blocking the copy-paste option, further securing the integrity of the test conducted.

SUBSCRIBE to the HackerEarth blog and enrich your monthly reading with our free e-newsletter – Fresh, insightful and awesome articles straight into your inbox from around the tech recruiting world!

Challenges faced when using proctored tests

  • Remote proctoring often requires access to a student’s computer and workspace, which can raise privacy issues.
  • Issues like poor internet connectivity, software glitches, and hardware compatibility can disrupt the testing process.
  • The presence of a proctor, even virtually, can increase anxiety levels in some test-takers, potentially impacting their performance.
  • Proctoring services can be expensive, and not all students may have access to the required technology, leading to inequalities.

Challenges faced when assessing candidates without proctored tests:

Without proctoring, there’s an increased risk of cheating and plagiarism, which can compromise the integrity of the exam.It becomes challenging to ensure that the work submitted is indeed the student’s own, making it difficult to accurately assess their knowledge and skills. Moreover, students who adhere to academic integrity might be at a disadvantage compared to those who do not.

Why should companies opt for online proctoring assessments?

With remote assessments becoming a norm, companies can assess and recruit talent irrespective of geographical constraints. However, unless these online assessments are proctored by a reliable proctor, there is no guarantee that the candidate who pulls off a brilliant performance during the assessment is the same one who is hired! Hence, it is crucial to verify the authenticity of the candidate who undertakes the assessment, and that is where online proctoring comes in handy. With its many stringent security measures in place, these tools ensure that the integrity of the assessment process is preserved.

Tips to select a good remote proctoring tool

  • Privacy compliance: Choose a tool that complies with privacy laws and regulations, such as GDPR or FERPA, and ensures data security.
  • User-friendly interface: The tool should be easy for both instructors and students to use, with clear instructions and minimal technical requirements.
  • Technical support: Opt for a service that offers robust technical support to address any issues promptly during the exam.
  • Customizable settings: Look for tools that offer customization in terms of the level of surveillance, types of permitted resources, and flexibility in exam settings.
  • Integration with Learning Management Systems (LMS): The tool should seamlessly integrate with existing LMS platforms to streamline the process.
  • Anti-cheating features: Ensure the tool has reliable anti-cheating features like identity verification, browser locking, AI monitoring, and plagiarism detection.
  • Accessibility and inclusivity: The proctoring solution should cater to students with different needs and provide accommodations where necessary.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Consider the cost of the tool and ensure it provides value for money, especially if it will be used extensively.
  • Trial and feedback: If possible, test the tool in a trial run and gather feedback from both instructors and students to assess its effectiveness and ease of use.
  • Reputation and reviews: Research and read reviews about the tool's performance, reliability, and customer satisfaction to make an informed decision.
  • What does the future hold?

    While we are clearly in the dark when it comes to what the future might unfold, we can be fairly certain that online assessments are going to be indispensable to recruitment, ergo the need for online proctoring. With its reliable safety features such as facial recognition, keyboard, and facial movement analysis, online proctoring goes a long way in preserving the integrity of the examination conducted. However, a quick search on the web will baffle you with the number of not-so-reputable blogs that provide tips and tricks to cheat these proctors. But these solutions require such laboriously elaborate set-ups that even the most hardened ‘cheater’ would be discouraged to take it up. And since its pros far outweigh its cons, it wouldn’t be too long before online proctoring is synonymous with online recruitment.

    Hire talent in your organization unbiased with HackerEarth Assessment

    Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

    Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

    Author
    Madhukesh Gautam
    Calendar Icon
    December 20, 2017
    Timer Icon
    5 min read
    Share

    Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

    Access Free Demo
    Related reads

    Discover more articles

    Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

    Vibe Coding: Shaping the Future of Software

    A New Era of CodeVibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today,...

    A New Era of Code

    Vibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today, when code is produced quickly through AI, the true value lies in designing, refining, and optimizing systems. Our role now goes beyond writing code; we must also ensure that our systems remain efficient and reliable.

    From Machine Language to Natural Language

    I recall the early days when every line of code was written manually. We progressed from machine language to high-level programming, and now we are beginning to interact with our tools using natural language. This development does not only increase speed but also changes how we approach problem solving. Product managers can now create working demos in hours instead of weeks, and founders have a clearer way of pitching their ideas with functional prototypes. It is important for us to rethink our role as developers and focus on architecture and system design rather than simply on typing c

    The Promise and the Pitfalls

    I have experienced both sides of vibe coding. In cases where the goal was to build a quick prototype or a simple internal tool, AI-generated code provided impressive results. Teams have been able to test new ideas and validate concepts much faster. However, when it comes to more complex systems that require careful planning and attention to detail, the output from AI can be problematic. I have seen situations where AI produces large volumes of code that become difficult to manage without significant human intervention.

    AI-powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot and AWS’s Q Developer have demonstrated significant productivity gains. For instance, at the National Australia Bank, it’s reported that half of the production code is generated by Q Developer, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving . Similarly, platforms like Lovable enable non-coders to build viable tech businesses using natural language prompts, contributing to a shift where AI-generated code reduces the need for large engineering teams. However, there are challenges. AI-generated code can sometimes be verbose or lack the architectural discipline required for complex systems. While AI can rapidly produce prototypes or simple utilities, building large-scale systems still necessitates experienced engineers to refine and optimize the code.​

    The Economic Impact

    The democratization of code generation is altering the economic landscape of software development. As AI tools become more prevalent, the value of average coding skills may diminish, potentially affecting salaries for entry-level positions. Conversely, developers who excel in system design, architecture, and optimization are likely to see increased demand and compensation.​
    Seizing the Opportunity

    Vibe coding is most beneficial in areas such as rapid prototyping and building simple applications or internal tools. It frees up valuable time that we can then invest in higher-level tasks such as system architecture, security, and user experience. When used in the right context, AI becomes a helpful partner that accelerates the development process without replacing the need for skilled engineers.

    This is revolutionizing our craft, much like the shift from machine language to assembly to high-level languages did in the past. AI can churn out code at lightning speed, but remember, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” Use AI for rapid prototyping, but it’s your expertise that transforms raw output into robust, scalable software. By honing our skills in design and architecture, we ensure our work remains impactful and enduring. Let’s continue to learn, adapt, and build software that stands the test of time.​

    Ready to streamline your recruitment process? Get a free demo to explore cutting-edge solutions and resources for your hiring needs.

    Guide to Conducting Successful System Design Interviews in 2025

    What is Systems Design?Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.Systems Design, in its...

    What is Systems Design?

    Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.

    Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.

    Systems Design, in its essence, is a blueprint of how software and applications should work to meet specific goals. The multi-dimensional nature of this discipline makes it open-ended – as there is no single one-size-fits-all solution to a system design problem.

    What is a System Design Interview?

    Conducting a System Design interview requires recruiters to take an unconventional approach and look beyond right or wrong answers. Recruiters should aim for evaluating a candidate’s ‘systemic thinking’ skills across three key aspects:

    How they navigate technical complexity and navigate uncertainty
    How they meet expectations of scale, security and speed
    How they focus on the bigger picture without losing sight of details

    This assessment of the end-to-end thought process and a holistic approach to problem-solving is what the interview should focus on.

    What are some common topics for a System Design Interview

    System design interview questions are free-form and exploratory in nature where there is no right or best answer to a specific problem statement. Here are some common questions:

    How would you approach the design of a social media app or video app?

    What are some ways to design a search engine or a ticketing system?

    How would you design an API for a payment gateway?

    What are some trade-offs and constraints you will consider while designing systems?

    What is your rationale for taking a particular approach to problem solving?

    Usually, interviewers base the questions depending on the organization, its goals, key competitors and a candidate’s experience level.

    For senior roles, the questions tend to focus on assessing the computational thinking, decision making and reasoning ability of a candidate. For entry level job interviews, the questions are designed to test the hard skills required for building a system architecture.

    The Difference between a System Design Interview and a Coding Interview

    If a coding interview is like a map that takes you from point A to Z – a systems design interview is like a compass which gives you a sense of the right direction.

    Here are three key difference between the two:

    Coding challenges follow a linear interviewing experience i.e. candidates are given a problem and interaction with recruiters is limited. System design interviews are more lateral and conversational, requiring active participation from interviewers.

    Coding interviews or challenges focus on evaluating the technical acumen of a candidate whereas systems design interviews are oriented to assess problem solving and interpersonal skills.

    Coding interviews are based on a right/wrong approach with ideal answers to problem statements while a systems design interview focuses on assessing the thought process and the ability to reason from first principles.

    How to Conduct an Effective System Design Interview

    One common mistake recruiters make is that they approach a system design interview with the expectations and preparation of a typical coding interview.
    Here is a four step framework technical recruiters can follow to ensure a seamless and productive interview experience:

    Step 1: Understand the subject at hand

    • Develop an understanding of basics of system design and architecture
    • Familiarize yourself with commonly asked systems design interview questions
    • Read about system design case studies for popular applications
    • Structure the questions and problems by increasing magnitude of difficulty

    Step 2: Prepare for the interview

    • Plan the extent of the topics and scope of discussion in advance
    • Clearly define the evaluation criteria and communicate expectations
    • Quantify constraints, inputs, boundaries and assumptions
    • Establish the broader context and a detailed scope of the exercise

    Step 3: Stay actively involved

    • Ask follow-up questions to challenge a solution
    • Probe candidates to gauge real-time logical reasoning skills
    • Make it a conversation and take notes of important pointers and outcomes
    • Guide candidates with hints and suggestions to steer them in the right direction

    Step 4: Be a collaborator

    • Encourage candidates to explore and consider alternative solutions
    • Work with the candidate to drill the problem into smaller tasks
    • Provide context and supporting details to help candidates stay on track
    • Ask follow-up questions to learn about the candidate’s experience

    Technical recruiters and hiring managers should aim for providing an environment of positive reinforcement, actionable feedback and encouragement to candidates.

    Evaluation Rubric for Candidates

    Facilitate Successful System Design Interview Experiences with FaceCode

    FaceCode, HackerEarth’s intuitive and secure platform, empowers recruiters to conduct system design interviews in a live coding environment with HD video chat.

    FaceCode comes with an interactive diagram board which makes it easier for interviewers to assess the design thinking skills and conduct communication assessments using a built-in library of diagram based questions.

    With FaceCode, you can combine your feedback points with AI-powered insights to generate accurate, data-driven assessment reports in a breeze. Plus, you can access interview recordings and transcripts anytime to recall and trace back the interview experience.

    Learn how FaceCode can help you conduct system design interviews and boost your hiring efficiency.

    How Candidates Use Technology to Cheat in Online Technical Assessments

    Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers. The ease and...

    Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring


    In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers.

    The ease and efficiency of virtual interviews, take home programming tests and remote coding challenges is transformative. Around 82% of companies use pre-employment assessments as reliable indicators of a candidate's skills and potential.

    Online skill assessment tests have been proven to streamline technical hiring and enable recruiters to significantly reduce the time and cost to identify and hire top talent.

    In the realm of online assessments, remote assessments have transformed the hiring landscape, boosting the speed and efficiency of screening and evaluating talent. On the flip side, candidates have learned how to use creative methods and AI tools to cheat in tests.

    As it turns out, technology that makes hiring easier for recruiters and managers - is also their Achilles' heel.

    Cheating in Online Assessments is a High Stakes Problem



    With the proliferation of AI in recruitment, the conversation around cheating has come to the forefront, putting recruiters and hiring managers in a bit of a flux.



    According to research, nearly 30 to 50 percent of candidates cheat in online assessments for entry level jobs. Even 10% of senior candidates have been reportedly caught cheating.

    The problem becomes twofold - if finding the right talent can be a competitive advantage, the consequences of hiring the wrong one can be equally damaging and counter-productive.

    As per Forbes, a wrong hire can cost a company around 30% of an employee's salary - not to mention, loss of precious productive hours and morale disruption.

    The question that arises is - "Can organizations continue to leverage AI-driven tools for online assessments without compromising on the integrity of their hiring process? "

    This article will discuss the common methods candidates use to outsmart online assessments. We will also dive deep into actionable steps that you can take to prevent cheating while delivering a positive candidate experience.

    Common Cheating Tactics and How You Can Combat Them


    1. Using ChatGPT and other AI tools to write code

      Copy-pasting code using AI-based platforms and online code generators is one of common cheat codes in candidates' books. For tackling technical assessments, candidates conveniently use readily available tools like ChatGPT and GitHub. Using these tools, candidates can easily generate solutions to solve common programming challenges such as:
      • Debugging code
      • Optimizing existing code
      • Writing problem-specific code from scratch
      Ways to prevent it
      • Enable full-screen mode
      • Disable copy-and-paste functionality
      • Restrict tab switching outside of code editors
      • Use AI to detect code that has been copied and pasted
    2. Enlist external help to complete the assessment


      Candidates often seek out someone else to take the assessment on their behalf. In many cases, they also use screen sharing and remote collaboration tools for real-time assistance.

      In extreme cases, some candidates might have an off-camera individual present in the same environment for help.

      Ways to prevent it
      • Verify a candidate using video authentication
      • Restrict test access from specific IP addresses
      • Use online proctoring by taking snapshots of the candidate periodically
      • Use a 360 degree environment scan to ensure no unauthorized individual is present
    3. Using multiple devices at the same time


      Candidates attempting to cheat often rely on secondary devices such as a computer, tablet, notebook or a mobile phone hidden from the line of sight of their webcam.

      By using multiple devices, candidates can look up information, search for solutions or simply augment their answers.

      Ways to prevent it
      • Track mouse exit count to detect irregularities
      • Detect when a new device or peripheral is connected
      • Use network monitoring and scanning to detect any smart devices in proximity
      • Conduct a virtual whiteboard interview to monitor movements and gestures
    4. Using remote desktop software and virtual machines


      Tech-savvy candidates go to great lengths to cheat. Using virtual machines, candidates can search for answers using a secondary OS while their primary OS is being monitored.

      Remote desktop software is another cheating technique which lets candidates give access to a third-person, allowing them to control their device.

      With remote desktops, candidates can screen share the test window and use external help.

      Ways to prevent it
      • Restrict access to virtual machines
      • AI-based proctoring for identifying malicious keystrokes
      • Use smart browsers to block candidates from using VMs

    Future-proof Your Online Assessments With HackerEarth

    HackerEarth's AI-powered online proctoring solution is a tested and proven way to outsmart cheating and take preventive measures at the right stage. With HackerEarth's Smart Browser, recruiters can mitigate the threat of cheating and ensure their online assessments are accurate and trustworthy.
    • Secure, sealed-off testing environment
    • AI-enabled live test monitoring
    • Enterprise-grade, industry leading compliance
    • Built-in features to track, detect and flag cheating attempts
    Boost your hiring efficiency and conduct reliable online assessments confidently with HackerEarth's revolutionary Smart Browser.
    Top Products

    Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

    Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
    Frame
    Hackathons
    Engage global developers through innovation
    Arrow
    Frame 2
    Assessments
    AI-driven advanced coding assessments
    Arrow
    Frame 3
    FaceCode
    Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
    Arrow
    Frame 4
    L & D
    Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
    Arrow
    Get A Free Demo