Home
/
Blog
/
DEI Hiring
/
7 LGBTQIA+ Members Talk About Their Experiences During Tech Hiring

7 LGBTQIA+ Members Talk About Their Experiences During Tech Hiring

Author
Guest Author
Calendar Icon
June 26, 2023
Timer Icon
8 min read
Share

From nerve-wracking job interviews to the nail-biting waiting period, navigating the tech industry’s hiring process is often a roller coaster of emotions.

Add in the additional layer of being a member of the LGBTQIA+ community in tech and identifying as a queer or non-binary individual. The ride becomes even more complex.

To shed light on these experiences, we have collected authentic narratives from seven LGBTQIA+ tech professionals.

These candid conversations reveal a spectrum of encounters, both empowering and challenging, and propose crucial strategies for cultivating a more inclusive recruiting landscape.

Read on.

Here’s what the LGBTQIA+ community in tech had to say about their interview experience

1. Cecilia Righini (They/Them), Founder and Creative Director of Studio Lutalica

a. Was disappointed when the employer asked them to omit their pronouns from the company signature.

Cecilia: As I was looking for my first job within the Design and Tech fields (as a Project or Design Manager), I had been asked by a potential employer to omit my pronouns from the company email signature. They said they were ‘absolutely ok with it’, but their clients ‘may not be’.

Asking someone to hide their identity at work is discrimination, and (now I am an agency owner myself) I believe agencies should take a stand against any type of discrimination. Educate your clients when possible or even consider not working with them at all.

b. But on the other hand, they also had a delightful experience.

Cecilia: When I interviewed with Lattimore and Friends, a London-based (remote-first) web development agency, I was told they were actively trying to employ more women and non-binary people as the tech industry is overwhelmingly male-dominated.

Once I joined, my employer immediately changed his signature to include his pronouns and asked everyone else to do the same, so I would feel comfortable including my pronouns in my signature.

Also read: How To Build Safe And ‘PROUD’ Workplaces – A Personal Story

2. We interviewed Lizi Gigauri (She/Her), Marketing Coordinator, Alphamoon.

Here’s what she had to say:

a. Can you share what kind of experience you had during the tech interview/hiring process?

Lizi: I have gone through many stages of recruitment with numerous tech companies in my downtime and not once have I explicitly been asked about my sexual orientation. I do however provide my pronouns.

From my (and my friends) experience the tech industry is the least judgmental about queerness – your job speaks for you, not your sexuality. It’s refreshing to see that no one cares about anyone’s sexuality. It’s not theirs to care about.

b. Was it a positive or a negative experience? Please elaborate.

Lizi: Some of the highlights in the past three years have been the support from people and culture officers who go out of their way to make it a comfortable and inclusive space for the LGBTQIA+ community in tech. One of the last companies I worked for donated money to several LGBTQ+ charities operating in Poland. The company also encouraged us to attend the pride parade (a very scary event) during pride month which was awesome to see.

In another company, I could choose to add another person to my private health insurance (gender or relation not specified). I’m pretty open about my sexuality and highlight it whenever there’s a possibility to see how others react.

In this country, you really need to test the waters and I often raise conversations about the living conditions in this country along with the struggles we have to go through. So to see the willingness to ensure the safety of their employees in every regard is undoubtedly a plus.

Write great job descriptions to hire talented members of the LGBTQIA+ community in tech - Free Checklist

c. What do you think needs to be changed to make tech hiring more inclusive of the queer community?

Lizi: I think one thing that could be changed is the linguistics. Due to the linguistics of the country which is gender-specific like most Slavic countries, the job offers are also gender-centered. For example, instead of saying writer (non-binary), it’s often writer (male).

Apart from this, I would also encourage more tech companies to ask and respect the pronouns of the applicant since here it’s seeped into the society to assume the gender based on the presentation.

Also read: 5-Step Guide To Gender-Fluid Tech Job Descriptions (+Free Checklist)

3. Swetha Harikrishnan(She/Her), Senior HR Director, HackerEarth

a. Can you share what kind of experience you had during the tech interview/hiring process?

Swetha: I’ve never really had much of an experience specifically being queer. However, there was this one time at this interview with HR folks with a global advertising/marketing Tech company. It had proclaimed to be really progressive when it comes to D&I and specifically had a target for reaching 50-50 composition on gender (men-women) in the company.

But I experienced behaviors that strongly demonstrated that I lost the final selection there because I said that I was queer and wanted to be a visible role model and work on LGBTQ+ inclusion under their D&I umbrella.

b. Was it a positive or a negative experience? Please elaborate.

While looking for new opportunities in terms of work, I was very clear that I wanted to be my whole self with the next company and brand I associate myself with. That means that I would transparently be letting the new employer know that I’m queer, I would like to visibly and vocally role model my personal journey as being queer and also talk about inclusion with that lens. Thus, carrying the brand/projecting the brand with me alongside my personal brand.

When I interviewed with HackerEarth, something that really stood out to me very naturally was that the group (leaders of the company) that I interviewed with was extremely diverse. And not talking in the sense of a typical ‘gender’ or LGBTQ+ diversity, but just naturally felt like they had a very diverse set of individuals with diverse personalities. Now this got me really excited. To feel ‘diversity’ in that sense. This was refreshing.

It’s riding on this feeling that I also decided to talk about my representation from the queer community to Sachin (the CEO) and my intent to visibly role model myself with the next brand/company that I associate myself with. When I asked him how he felt about it, he said that’s totally up to me and that he doesn’t see why I wouldn’t be able to do that with HackerEarth.

Now it’s one thing to talk the language, and it’s another to actually walk it. You need to be fiercely authentic and bold to walk it. The conversation with Sachin and his views here felt very honest and genuine and he did not appear as a trained ‘leader’ who’s blindly following a language without believing in it.

Fast forward to the date today, I stand here vouching for HackerEarth being the most inclusive company I’ve worked with, as a culture.

This is very difficult to establish. I’m not saying that we don’t make mistakes. I’m saying that with ‘inclusion and creating a safe space for everyone’ being at the heart of the company, we take every step to acknowledge our mistakes, correct them, and not make the same mistake again.

Also read: Embracing DE&I At The Workplace – #1 Back To The Basics

Swetha provided the following pointers on how the process can be improved to make it more comfortable for the LGBTQIA+ community in tech:

Educate your staff and give them the proper tools for hiring. We need to ensure that we walk the talk. A queer representation on the hiring panel/team would be awesome too.

  • Train your employees on the overall inclusion definition, how to tackle unconscious bias, what personal definitions for inclusion look like for each individual (reflect internally, then externally), and what is psychological safety (respect for all & their views)
  • Next, train them on what LGBTQ+ means under the larger umbrella of inclusion.
  • Tools: Hide PII + make all elements gender-neutral.
  • Organize a recruitment drive for hiring folks only from the queer community – be bold and transparent in the communication and intent here. It’s okay to positively have a selection to move towards ‘equity’.
  • Use gender-neutral language: on the job descriptions that TA folks use to communicate with potential candidates, on our website, etc.
  • Ensure that our policies & benefits have LGBTQ+ inclusion and talk proactively about:
    • Anti-harassment policy coverage
    • gender-neutral restrooms, if any.
    • insurance for same partner coverage + gender affirmation surgery coverage etc.
    • EAP (employee assistance partner) – covered for queer community-related mental well-being and language.
  • Create & talk about the queer support groups/ERGs (employee resource groups) in the company.

5. Shakambari Jaiswal (She/Her), Customer Success Associate at Recruit CRM

a. Can you share what kind of experience you had during the tech interview/hiring process?

Shakambari: This one time when I was interviewed for a job at an IT company, they really didn’t seem queer-friendly and didn’t care much about pronouns. I also noticed their minimal knowledge of the LGBTQIA+ community in tech.

I identify as bisexual and I have never really felt safe to disclose my identity during interviews or even once I become an employee, often because people are too quick to judge.

b. Was it a positive or a negative experience? Please elaborate.

Shakambari: However, my experience with Recruit CRM was pleasant. I feel incredibly grateful for the recruitment process that introduced me to this remarkable team. Right from the start, they displayed a remarkable level of inclusivity, ensuring that my pronouns were consistently acknowledged and respected. Their open-mindedness and lack of bias toward my bisexuality were truly inspiring, making me feel valued and welcomed as an individual in their inclusive work environment.

Also read: 8 Unconsciously Sexist Interview Questions You’re Asking Your Female Candidates

6. Employees and the Founder of COMPT share their views on the tech hiring process

  • Amy Spurling (She/Her), founder & CEO, identifies as lesbian:

Amy: There is so much that needs to change – too many to enumerate here. One place I’d point out is that too often, companies get into the space of “we are a family-oriented company,” but then all of their definitions of family are straight, cisgender parents with kids. Families come in all shapes, sizes, and designs.

As a member of the queer community, I often feel like I have to justify or further define my family (in prior companies). Normalize that everyone has a family, but every family looks different.

Normalize your “family” benefits to include things beyond fertility treatments and child care – things like adoption, surrogacy (where it’s legal), pet care, eldercare, or even just supporting mental and physical wellness (what family doesn’t need that!).”

  • Anonymous (She/Her), Marketing Manager, identifies as gay

a. Can you share what kind of experience you had during the tech interview/hiring process?

“I had an awesome experience interviewing with Compt. For one, I didn’t have to create an account in one of those applicant tracking systems where it feels like your application just disappears into a black hole. I sent my application directly to the hiring manager via email, and he reached out personally to schedule an interview. Every step of the interview and hiring process that followed was equally thoughtful. Many companies claim to be people-first, but Compt truly walks the walk.

b. Was it a positive or a negative experience? Please elaborate.

Unfortunately, I have not felt comfortable disclosing details about my personal life in past job interviews out of fear of experiencing discrimination.

However, Compt publicly talks about its efforts to hire a diverse team, even going as far as sharing data on what percentage of the staff identifies as LGBTQ+.

The fact that our CEO personally tracks this information made me feel like there is a genuine commitment to creating an inclusive work environment, which put me at ease.”

c. What do you think needs to be changed to make tech hiring more inclusive of the queer community?

“I think companies need to take it a step further beyond just saying, “We don’t tolerate discrimination.” They should make it clear that they are actively searching for candidates from diverse backgrounds, including individuals from the queer community. This could be especially helpful for companies located in states where anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is prevalent.

Also, training people who are in positions to make hiring decisions is crucial. Sometimes a hiring manager simply wants to develop rapport with a candidate and may ask an innocent question like “Do you have kids?”, but it’s important to understand what questions should be avoided to promote fairness in the hiring process.”

  • Tim Faherty (He/Him), Customer Success Manager

Tim: I had a seamless experience during the hiring process for Compt. The leadership team stayed transparent throughout and set expectations and next steps accordingly for the interview and follow-up process. All my questions were answered thoroughly, and expectations were set on when I could expect more information about the next steps in the hiring process.

Tim believes that transparency is the key to ensuring a smooth tech recruiting process:

Knowing you’re interviewing for a diverse company makes hiring so much easier from an applicant’s perspective. If a company doesn’t outwardly advertise its diversity, then it can add anxiety as a person never truly knows the work environment they might walk into.

A queer person is never finished coming out, as things like a new job put that person in a position where they will inevitably address their sexuality. Transparency is the key to eliminating potential anxiety.

As we unwrap these stories, we realize that the journey to an inclusive hiring process is a shared responsibility – demanding transparency, active inclusion, and constant learning.

Let’s champion diversity by remembering these narratives and embedding their lessons into our tech industry’s hiring tapestry.

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Guest Author
Calendar Icon
June 26, 2023
Timer Icon
8 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

Vibe Coding: Shaping the Future of Software

A New Era of CodeVibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today,...

A New Era of Code

Vibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today, when code is produced quickly through AI, the true value lies in designing, refining, and optimizing systems. Our role now goes beyond writing code; we must also ensure that our systems remain efficient and reliable.

From Machine Language to Natural Language

I recall the early days when every line of code was written manually. We progressed from machine language to high-level programming, and now we are beginning to interact with our tools using natural language. This development does not only increase speed but also changes how we approach problem solving. Product managers can now create working demos in hours instead of weeks, and founders have a clearer way of pitching their ideas with functional prototypes. It is important for us to rethink our role as developers and focus on architecture and system design rather than simply on typing c

The Promise and the Pitfalls

I have experienced both sides of vibe coding. In cases where the goal was to build a quick prototype or a simple internal tool, AI-generated code provided impressive results. Teams have been able to test new ideas and validate concepts much faster. However, when it comes to more complex systems that require careful planning and attention to detail, the output from AI can be problematic. I have seen situations where AI produces large volumes of code that become difficult to manage without significant human intervention.

AI-powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot and AWS’s Q Developer have demonstrated significant productivity gains. For instance, at the National Australia Bank, it’s reported that half of the production code is generated by Q Developer, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving . Similarly, platforms like Lovable enable non-coders to build viable tech businesses using natural language prompts, contributing to a shift where AI-generated code reduces the need for large engineering teams. However, there are challenges. AI-generated code can sometimes be verbose or lack the architectural discipline required for complex systems. While AI can rapidly produce prototypes or simple utilities, building large-scale systems still necessitates experienced engineers to refine and optimize the code.​

The Economic Impact

The democratization of code generation is altering the economic landscape of software development. As AI tools become more prevalent, the value of average coding skills may diminish, potentially affecting salaries for entry-level positions. Conversely, developers who excel in system design, architecture, and optimization are likely to see increased demand and compensation.​
Seizing the Opportunity

Vibe coding is most beneficial in areas such as rapid prototyping and building simple applications or internal tools. It frees up valuable time that we can then invest in higher-level tasks such as system architecture, security, and user experience. When used in the right context, AI becomes a helpful partner that accelerates the development process without replacing the need for skilled engineers.

This is revolutionizing our craft, much like the shift from machine language to assembly to high-level languages did in the past. AI can churn out code at lightning speed, but remember, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” Use AI for rapid prototyping, but it’s your expertise that transforms raw output into robust, scalable software. By honing our skills in design and architecture, we ensure our work remains impactful and enduring. Let’s continue to learn, adapt, and build software that stands the test of time.​

Ready to streamline your recruitment process? Get a free demo to explore cutting-edge solutions and resources for your hiring needs.

Guide to Conducting Successful System Design Interviews in 2025

What is Systems Design?Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.Systems Design, in its...

What is Systems Design?

Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.

Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.

Systems Design, in its essence, is a blueprint of how software and applications should work to meet specific goals. The multi-dimensional nature of this discipline makes it open-ended – as there is no single one-size-fits-all solution to a system design problem.

What is a System Design Interview?

Conducting a System Design interview requires recruiters to take an unconventional approach and look beyond right or wrong answers. Recruiters should aim for evaluating a candidate’s ‘systemic thinking’ skills across three key aspects:

How they navigate technical complexity and navigate uncertainty
How they meet expectations of scale, security and speed
How they focus on the bigger picture without losing sight of details

This assessment of the end-to-end thought process and a holistic approach to problem-solving is what the interview should focus on.

What are some common topics for a System Design Interview

System design interview questions are free-form and exploratory in nature where there is no right or best answer to a specific problem statement. Here are some common questions:

How would you approach the design of a social media app or video app?

What are some ways to design a search engine or a ticketing system?

How would you design an API for a payment gateway?

What are some trade-offs and constraints you will consider while designing systems?

What is your rationale for taking a particular approach to problem solving?

Usually, interviewers base the questions depending on the organization, its goals, key competitors and a candidate’s experience level.

For senior roles, the questions tend to focus on assessing the computational thinking, decision making and reasoning ability of a candidate. For entry level job interviews, the questions are designed to test the hard skills required for building a system architecture.

The Difference between a System Design Interview and a Coding Interview

If a coding interview is like a map that takes you from point A to Z – a systems design interview is like a compass which gives you a sense of the right direction.

Here are three key difference between the two:

Coding challenges follow a linear interviewing experience i.e. candidates are given a problem and interaction with recruiters is limited. System design interviews are more lateral and conversational, requiring active participation from interviewers.

Coding interviews or challenges focus on evaluating the technical acumen of a candidate whereas systems design interviews are oriented to assess problem solving and interpersonal skills.

Coding interviews are based on a right/wrong approach with ideal answers to problem statements while a systems design interview focuses on assessing the thought process and the ability to reason from first principles.

How to Conduct an Effective System Design Interview

One common mistake recruiters make is that they approach a system design interview with the expectations and preparation of a typical coding interview.
Here is a four step framework technical recruiters can follow to ensure a seamless and productive interview experience:

Step 1: Understand the subject at hand

  • Develop an understanding of basics of system design and architecture
  • Familiarize yourself with commonly asked systems design interview questions
  • Read about system design case studies for popular applications
  • Structure the questions and problems by increasing magnitude of difficulty

Step 2: Prepare for the interview

  • Plan the extent of the topics and scope of discussion in advance
  • Clearly define the evaluation criteria and communicate expectations
  • Quantify constraints, inputs, boundaries and assumptions
  • Establish the broader context and a detailed scope of the exercise

Step 3: Stay actively involved

  • Ask follow-up questions to challenge a solution
  • Probe candidates to gauge real-time logical reasoning skills
  • Make it a conversation and take notes of important pointers and outcomes
  • Guide candidates with hints and suggestions to steer them in the right direction

Step 4: Be a collaborator

  • Encourage candidates to explore and consider alternative solutions
  • Work with the candidate to drill the problem into smaller tasks
  • Provide context and supporting details to help candidates stay on track
  • Ask follow-up questions to learn about the candidate’s experience

Technical recruiters and hiring managers should aim for providing an environment of positive reinforcement, actionable feedback and encouragement to candidates.

Evaluation Rubric for Candidates

Facilitate Successful System Design Interview Experiences with FaceCode

FaceCode, HackerEarth’s intuitive and secure platform, empowers recruiters to conduct system design interviews in a live coding environment with HD video chat.

FaceCode comes with an interactive diagram board which makes it easier for interviewers to assess the design thinking skills and conduct communication assessments using a built-in library of diagram based questions.

With FaceCode, you can combine your feedback points with AI-powered insights to generate accurate, data-driven assessment reports in a breeze. Plus, you can access interview recordings and transcripts anytime to recall and trace back the interview experience.

Learn how FaceCode can help you conduct system design interviews and boost your hiring efficiency.

How Candidates Use Technology to Cheat in Online Technical Assessments

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers. The ease and...

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring


In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers.

The ease and efficiency of virtual interviews, take home programming tests and remote coding challenges is transformative. Around 82% of companies use pre-employment assessments as reliable indicators of a candidate's skills and potential.

Online skill assessment tests have been proven to streamline technical hiring and enable recruiters to significantly reduce the time and cost to identify and hire top talent.

In the realm of online assessments, remote assessments have transformed the hiring landscape, boosting the speed and efficiency of screening and evaluating talent. On the flip side, candidates have learned how to use creative methods and AI tools to cheat in tests.

As it turns out, technology that makes hiring easier for recruiters and managers - is also their Achilles' heel.

Cheating in Online Assessments is a High Stakes Problem



With the proliferation of AI in recruitment, the conversation around cheating has come to the forefront, putting recruiters and hiring managers in a bit of a flux.



According to research, nearly 30 to 50 percent of candidates cheat in online assessments for entry level jobs. Even 10% of senior candidates have been reportedly caught cheating.

The problem becomes twofold - if finding the right talent can be a competitive advantage, the consequences of hiring the wrong one can be equally damaging and counter-productive.

As per Forbes, a wrong hire can cost a company around 30% of an employee's salary - not to mention, loss of precious productive hours and morale disruption.

The question that arises is - "Can organizations continue to leverage AI-driven tools for online assessments without compromising on the integrity of their hiring process? "

This article will discuss the common methods candidates use to outsmart online assessments. We will also dive deep into actionable steps that you can take to prevent cheating while delivering a positive candidate experience.

Common Cheating Tactics and How You Can Combat Them


  1. Using ChatGPT and other AI tools to write code

    Copy-pasting code using AI-based platforms and online code generators is one of common cheat codes in candidates' books. For tackling technical assessments, candidates conveniently use readily available tools like ChatGPT and GitHub. Using these tools, candidates can easily generate solutions to solve common programming challenges such as:
    • Debugging code
    • Optimizing existing code
    • Writing problem-specific code from scratch
    Ways to prevent it
    • Enable full-screen mode
    • Disable copy-and-paste functionality
    • Restrict tab switching outside of code editors
    • Use AI to detect code that has been copied and pasted
  2. Enlist external help to complete the assessment


    Candidates often seek out someone else to take the assessment on their behalf. In many cases, they also use screen sharing and remote collaboration tools for real-time assistance.

    In extreme cases, some candidates might have an off-camera individual present in the same environment for help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Verify a candidate using video authentication
    • Restrict test access from specific IP addresses
    • Use online proctoring by taking snapshots of the candidate periodically
    • Use a 360 degree environment scan to ensure no unauthorized individual is present
  3. Using multiple devices at the same time


    Candidates attempting to cheat often rely on secondary devices such as a computer, tablet, notebook or a mobile phone hidden from the line of sight of their webcam.

    By using multiple devices, candidates can look up information, search for solutions or simply augment their answers.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Track mouse exit count to detect irregularities
    • Detect when a new device or peripheral is connected
    • Use network monitoring and scanning to detect any smart devices in proximity
    • Conduct a virtual whiteboard interview to monitor movements and gestures
  4. Using remote desktop software and virtual machines


    Tech-savvy candidates go to great lengths to cheat. Using virtual machines, candidates can search for answers using a secondary OS while their primary OS is being monitored.

    Remote desktop software is another cheating technique which lets candidates give access to a third-person, allowing them to control their device.

    With remote desktops, candidates can screen share the test window and use external help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Restrict access to virtual machines
    • AI-based proctoring for identifying malicious keystrokes
    • Use smart browsers to block candidates from using VMs

Future-proof Your Online Assessments With HackerEarth

HackerEarth's AI-powered online proctoring solution is a tested and proven way to outsmart cheating and take preventive measures at the right stage. With HackerEarth's Smart Browser, recruiters can mitigate the threat of cheating and ensure their online assessments are accurate and trustworthy.
  • Secure, sealed-off testing environment
  • AI-enabled live test monitoring
  • Enterprise-grade, industry leading compliance
  • Built-in features to track, detect and flag cheating attempts
Boost your hiring efficiency and conduct reliable online assessments confidently with HackerEarth's revolutionary Smart Browser.
Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo