Home
/
Blog
/
Developer Insights
/
Simple Tutorial on SVM and Parameter Tuning in Python and R

Simple Tutorial on SVM and Parameter Tuning in Python and R

Author
Rashmi Jain
Calendar Icon
February 21, 2017
Timer Icon
9 min read
Share

Introduction

Data classification is a very important task in machine learning.Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are widely applied in the field of pattern classifications and nonlinear regressions. The original form of the SVM algorithm was introduced by Vladimir N. Vapnik and Alexey Ya. Chervonenkis in 1963. Since then, SVMs have been transformed tremendously to be used successfully in many real-world problemssuch as text (and hypertext) categorization,image classification,bioinformatics (Protein classification,Cancer classification), handwritten character recognition, etc.

Table of Contents

  1. What is a Support Vector Machine?
  2. How does it work?
  3. Derivation of SVM Equations
  4. Pros and Cons of SVMs
  5. Python and R implementation

What is a Support Vector Machine(SVM)?

A Support Vector Machine is a supervised machine learning algorithm which can be used for both classification and regression problems. It follows a technique called the kernel trick to transform the data and based on these transformations, it finds an optimal boundary between the possible outputs.

In simple words, it does some extremely complex data transformations to figure out how to separate the data based on the labels or outputs defined.We will be looking only at the SVM classification algorithm in this article.

Support Vector Machine Classification Algorithm

How does it work?

The main idea is to identify the optimal separating hyperplane which maximizes the margin of the training data. Let us understand this objective term by term.

What is a separating hyperplane?

We can see that it is possible to separate the data given in the plot above. For instance, we can draw a line in which all the points above the line are green and the ones below the line are red. Such a line is said to be a separating hyperplane.

Now the obvious confusion, why is it called a hyperplane if it is a line?

In the diagram above, we have considered the simplest of examples, i.e., the dataset lies in the 2-dimensional plane(R2). But the support vector machine can work for a general n-dimensional dataset too. And in the case of higher dimensions, thehyperplane is the generalization of a plane.

More formally, it is an n-1 dimensional subspace of an n-dimensional Euclidean space. So for a

  • 1D dataset, a single point represents the hyperplane.
  • 2D dataset, a line is a hyperplane.
  • 3D dataset, a plane is a hyperplane.
  • And in the higher dimension, it is called a hyperplane.

We have said that the objective of an SVM is to find the optimal separating hyperplane. When is a separating hyperplane said to be optimal?

The fact that there exists a hyperplane separating the dataset doesn’t mean that it is the best one.

Let us understand the optimal hyperplane through a set of diagrams.

  1. Multiple hyperplanes
    There are multiple hyperplanes, but which one of them is a separating hyperplane? It can be easily seen that line B is the one which best separates the two classes.
Support Vector Machines multiple hyperplanes
  1. Multiple separating hyperplanes
    There can be multiple separating as well. How do wefind the optimal one? Intuitively, if we select a hyperplane which is close to the data points of one class, then it might not generalize well. So the aim is to choose the hyperplane which is as far as possible from the data points of each category.
multiple separating hyperplanes SVM
  1. In the diagram above, the hyperplane that meets the specified criteria for the optimal hyperplane is B.

Therefore, maximizing the distance between the nearest points of each class and the hyperplane would result in an optimal separating hyperplane. This distance is called the margin.

The goal of SVMs is to find the optimal hyperplane because it not only classifies the existing dataset but also helps predict the class of the unseen data. And the optimal hyperplane is the one which has the biggest margin.

Optimal hyperplane SVM

Mathematical Setup

Now that we have understood the basic setup of this algorithm, let us dive straight into the mathematical technicalities of SVMs.

I will be assuming you are familiar withbasic mathematical concepts such as vectors, vector arithmetic(addition, subtraction, dot product) and the orthogonal projection. Some of these concepts can also be found in the article, Prerequisites of linear algebra for machine learning.

Equation of Hyperplane

You musthave come across the equation of a straight line as y=mx+c, where m is the slope and cis the y-intercept of the line.

The generalized equation of a hyperplane is as follows:

wTx=0

Here w and x are the vectors and wTx represents the dot product of the two vectors. The vector w is often called as the weight vector.

Consider the equation of the line as y−mx−c=0.In this case,

w=⎛⎝⎜−c−m1⎞⎠⎟ and x=⎛⎝⎜1xy⎞⎠⎟

wTx=−c×1−m×x+y=y−mx−c=0

It is just two different ways of representing the same thing. So why do we use wTx=0? Simply because it is easier to deal with this representation in thecase of higher dimensional dataset and w represents the vector which is normal to the hyperplane. This property will be useful once we start computing the distance from a point to the hyperplane.

Machine learning challenge, ML challenge

Understanding the constraints

The training data in our classification problem is of the form {(x1,y1),(x2,y2),…,(xn,yn)}∈Rn×−1,1. This means that the training dataset is a pair of xi, an n-dimensional feature vector and yi, the label of xi. When yi=1 implies that the sample with the feature vector xi belongs to class 1 and if yi=−1 implies that the sample belongs to class -1.

In a classification problem, we thus try to find out a function, y=f(x):Rn⟶{−1,1}. f(x) learns from the training data set and then applies its knowledge to classify the unseen data.

There are an infinite number of functions, f(x) that can exist, so we have to restrict the class of functions that we are dealing with. In thecase of SVM’s, this class of functions is that of the hyperplanerepresented as wTx=0.

It can also be represented as w⃗ .x⃗ +b=0;w⃗ ∈Rn and b∈R

This divides the input space into two parts, one containing vectors of class ?1 and the other containing vectors of class +1.

For the rest of this article, we will consider 2-dimensional vectors. Let H0 be a hyperplane separating the dataset and satisfying the following:

w⃗ .x⃗ +b=0

Along with H0, we can select two others hyperplanes H1 and H2 such that they also separate the data and have the following equations:

w⃗ .x⃗ +b=δ and w⃗ .x⃗ +b=-δ

This makes Ho equidistant from H1 as well as H2.

The variable ? is not necessary so we can set ?=1 to simplify the problem as w⃗ .x⃗ +b=1 and w⃗ .x⃗ +b=-1

Next, we want to ensure that there is no point between them. So for this, we will select only those hyperplanes which satisfy the following constraints:

For every vector xieither:

  1. w⃗ .x⃗ +b≤-1 for xi having the class ?1 or
  2. w⃗ .x⃗ +b≥1 for xi having the class 1
constraints_SVM

Combining the constraints

Both the constraints stated above can be combined into a single constraint.

Constraint 1:

For xi having the class -1, w⃗ .x⃗ +b≤-1
Multiplying both sides by yi (which is always -1 for this equation)
yi(w⃗ .x⃗ +b)≥yi(−1) which implies yi(w⃗ .x⃗ +b)≥1 for xi having the class?1.

Constraint 2:yi=1

yi(w⃗ .x⃗ +b)≥1 for xi having the class 1

Combining both the above equations, we get yi(w⃗ .x⃗ +b)≥1 for all 1≤i≤n

This leads to a unique constraint instead of two which are mathematically equivalent. The combined new constraint also has the same effect, i.e., no points between the two hyperplanes.

Maximize the margin

For the sake of simplicity, we will skip the derivation of the formula for calculating the margin, m which is

m=2||w⃗ ||

The only variable in this formula is w, which is indirectly proportional to m, hence to maximize the margin we will have to minimize ||w⃗ ||. This leads to the following optimization problem:

Minimize in (w⃗ ,b){||w⃗ ||22 subject to yi(w⃗ .x⃗ +b)≥1 for any i=1,…,n

The above is the case when our data is linearly separable. There are many cases where the data can not be perfectly classified through linear separation. In such cases, Support Vector Machine looks for the hyperplane that maximizes the margin and minimizes the misclassifications.

For this, we introduce the slack variable,ζi which allows some objects to fall off the margin but it penalizes them.

Slack variables SVM

In this scenario, the algorithm tries to maintain the slack variable to zero while maximizing the margin. However, it minimizes the sum of distances of the misclassification from the margin hyperplanes and not the number of misclassifications.

Constraints now changes to yi(w⃗ .xi→+b)≥1−ζi for all 1≤i≤n,ζi≥0

and the optimization problem changes to

Minimize in (w⃗ ,b){||w⃗ ||22+C∑iζi subject to yi(w⃗ .x⃗ +b)≥1−ζi for any i=1,…,n

Here, the parameter C is the regularization parameter that controls the trade-off between the slack variable penalty (misclassifications) and width of the margin.

  • Small C makes the constraints easy to ignore which leads to a large margin.
  • Large C allows the constraints hard to be ignored which leads to a small margin.
  • For C=inf, all the constraints are enforced.

The easiest way to separate two classes of data is a line in case of 2D data and a plane in case of 3D data. But it is not always possible to use lines or planes and one requires a nonlinear region to separate these classes. Support Vector Machines handle such situations by using a kernel function which maps the data to a different space where a linear hyperplane can be used to separate classes. This is known as thekernel trick where the kernel function transforms the data into the higher dimensional feature space so that a linear separation is possible.

kernel trick SVM

If ϕ is the kernel function which maps xito ϕ(xi), the constraints change toyi(w⃗ .ϕ(xi)+b)≥1−ζi for all 1≤i≤n,ζi≥0

And the optimization problem is

Minimize in (w⃗ ,b){||w⃗ ||22+C∑iζi subject to yi(w⃗ .ϕ(xi)+b)≥1−ζi  for all 1≤i≤n,ζi≥0

We will not get into the solution of these optimization problems. The most common method used to solve these optimization problems is Convex Optimization.

Pros and Cons of Support Vector Machines

Every classification algorithm has its own advantages and disadvantages that are come into play according to the dataset being analyzed. Some of the advantages of SVMs are as follows:

  • The very nature of the Convex Optimization method ensures guaranteed optimality. The solution is guaranteed to be a global minimum and not a local minimum.
  • SVMis an algorithm which is suitable for both linearly and nonlinearly separable data (using kernel trick). The only thing to do is to come up with the regularization term, C.
  • SVMswork well on small as well as high dimensional data spaces. It works effectively for high-dimensional datasets because of the fact that the complexity of the training dataset in SVM is generally characterized by the number of support vectors rather than the dimensionality. Even if all other training examples are removed and the training is repeated, we will get the same optimal separating hyperplane.
  • SVMscan work effectively on smaller training datasets as they don’trely on the entire data.

Disadvantages of SVMs are as follows:

  • Theyarenot suitable for larger datasets because the training time with SVMs can be high and much more computationally intensive.
  • They areless effective on noisier datasets that have overlapping classes.

SVM with Python and R

Let us look at the libraries and functions used to implement SVM in Python and R.

Python Implementation

The most widely used library for implementing machine learning algorithms in Python is scikit-learn. The class used for SVMclassification in scikit-learn issvm.SVC()

sklearn.svm.SVC (C=1.0, kernel=’rbf’, degree=3, gamma=’auto’)

Parameters are as follows:

  • C: It is the regularization parameter, C, of the error term.
  • kernel: It specifies the kernel type to be used in the algorithm. It can be ‘linear’, ‘poly’, ‘rbf’, ‘sigmoid’, ‘precomputed’, or a callable. The default value is ‘rbf’.
  • degree: It is the degree of the polynomial kernel function (‘poly’) and is ignored by all other kernels. The default valueis 3.
  • gamma: It is the kernel coefficient for ‘rbf’, ‘poly’, and ‘sigmoid’. If gamma is ‘auto’, then 1/n_features will be used instead.

There are many advanced parameters too which I have not discussed here. You can check them outhere.

https://gist.github.com/HackerEarthBlog/07492b3da67a2eb0ee8308da60bf40d9

One can tune the SVM by changing the parameters C,γ and the kernel function. The function for tuning the parameters available in scikit-learn is called gridSearchCV().

sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV(estimator, param_grid)

Parameters of this function are defined as:

  • estimator: It is theestimator object which is svm.SVC() in our case.
  • param_grid: It is the dictionary or list with parameters names (string) as keys and lists of parameter settings to try as values.

To know more about other parameters of GridSearch.CV(), click here.

https://gist.github.com/HackerEarthBlog/a84a446810494d4ca0c178e864ab2391

In the above code, the parameters we have considered for tuning are kernel, C, and gamma. The values from which the best value is to be are the ones written in the bracket. Here, we have only given a few values to be considered but a whole range of values can be given for tuning but it will take a longer time for execution.

R Implementation

The package that we will use for implementing SVM algorithm in R is e1071. The function used will be svm().

https://gist.github.com/HackerEarthBlog/0336338c5d93dc3d724a8edb67ad0a05

Summary

Inthis article, Ihave gone through a very basic explanation of SVM classification algorithm. I have left outa few mathematical complications such as calculating distances and solving the optimization problem. But I hope this gives you enough know-how abouthow a machine learning algorithm, that is,SVM, can be modified based on the type of dataset provided.

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Rashmi Jain
Calendar Icon
February 21, 2017
Timer Icon
9 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

Vibe Coding: Shaping the Future of Software

A New Era of CodeVibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today,...

A New Era of Code

Vibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today, when code is produced quickly through AI, the true value lies in designing, refining, and optimizing systems. Our role now goes beyond writing code; we must also ensure that our systems remain efficient and reliable.

From Machine Language to Natural Language

I recall the early days when every line of code was written manually. We progressed from machine language to high-level programming, and now we are beginning to interact with our tools using natural language. This development does not only increase speed but also changes how we approach problem solving. Product managers can now create working demos in hours instead of weeks, and founders have a clearer way of pitching their ideas with functional prototypes. It is important for us to rethink our role as developers and focus on architecture and system design rather than simply on typing code.

The Promise and the Pitfalls

I have experienced both sides of vibe coding. In cases where the goal was to build a quick prototype or a simple internal tool, AI-generated code provided impressive results. Teams have been able to test new ideas and validate concepts much faster. However, when it comes to more complex systems that require careful planning and attention to detail, the output from AI can be problematic. I have seen situations where AI produces large volumes of code that become difficult to manage without significant human intervention.

AI-powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot and AWS’s Q Developer have demonstrated significant productivity gains. For instance, at the National Australia Bank, it’s reported that half of the production code is generated by Q Developer, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving . Similarly, platforms like Lovable enable non-coders to build viable tech businesses using natural language prompts, contributing to a shift where AI-generated code reduces the need for large engineering teams. However, there are challenges. AI-generated code can sometimes be verbose or lack the architectural discipline required for complex systems. While AI can rapidly produce prototypes or simple utilities, building large-scale systems still necessitates experienced engineers to refine and optimize the code.​

The Economic Impact

The democratization of code generation is altering the economic landscape of software development. As AI tools become more prevalent, the value of average coding skills may diminish, potentially affecting salaries for entry-level positions. Conversely, developers who excel in system design, architecture, and optimization are likely to see increased demand and compensation.​
Seizing the Opportunity

Vibe coding is most beneficial in areas such as rapid prototyping and building simple applications or internal tools. It frees up valuable time that we can then invest in higher-level tasks such as system architecture, security, and user experience. When used in the right context, AI becomes a helpful partner that accelerates the development process without replacing the need for skilled engineers.

This is revolutionizing our craft, much like the shift from machine language to assembly to high-level languages did in the past. AI can churn out code at lightning speed, but remember, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” Use AI for rapid prototyping, but it’s your expertise that transforms raw output into robust, scalable software. By honing our skills in design and architecture, we ensure our work remains impactful and enduring. Let’s continue to learn, adapt, and build software that stands the test of time.​

Ready to streamline your recruitment process? Get a free demo to explore cutting-edge solutions and resources for your hiring needs.

Guide to Conducting Successful System Design Interviews in 2025

What is Systems Design?Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.Systems Design, in its...

What is Systems Design?

Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.

Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.

Systems Design, in its essence, is a blueprint of how software and applications should work to meet specific goals. The multi-dimensional nature of this discipline makes it open-ended – as there is no single one-size-fits-all solution to a system design problem.

What is a System Design Interview?

Conducting a System Design interview requires recruiters to take an unconventional approach and look beyond right or wrong answers. Recruiters should aim for evaluating a candidate’s ‘systemic thinking’ skills across three key aspects:

How they navigate technical complexity and navigate uncertainty
How they meet expectations of scale, security and speed
How they focus on the bigger picture without losing sight of details

This assessment of the end-to-end thought process and a holistic approach to problem-solving is what the interview should focus on.

What are some common topics for a System Design Interview

System design interview questions are free-form and exploratory in nature where there is no right or best answer to a specific problem statement. Here are some common questions:

How would you approach the design of a social media app or video app?

What are some ways to design a search engine or a ticketing system?

How would you design an API for a payment gateway?

What are some trade-offs and constraints you will consider while designing systems?

What is your rationale for taking a particular approach to problem solving?

Usually, interviewers base the questions depending on the organization, its goals, key competitors and a candidate’s experience level.

For senior roles, the questions tend to focus on assessing the computational thinking, decision making and reasoning ability of a candidate. For entry level job interviews, the questions are designed to test the hard skills required for building a system architecture.

The Difference between a System Design Interview and a Coding Interview

If a coding interview is like a map that takes you from point A to Z – a systems design interview is like a compass which gives you a sense of the right direction.

Here are three key difference between the two:

Coding challenges follow a linear interviewing experience i.e. candidates are given a problem and interaction with recruiters is limited. System design interviews are more lateral and conversational, requiring active participation from interviewers.

Coding interviews or challenges focus on evaluating the technical acumen of a candidate whereas systems design interviews are oriented to assess problem solving and interpersonal skills.

Coding interviews are based on a right/wrong approach with ideal answers to problem statements while a systems design interview focuses on assessing the thought process and the ability to reason from first principles.

How to Conduct an Effective System Design Interview

One common mistake recruiters make is that they approach a system design interview with the expectations and preparation of a typical coding interview.
Here is a four step framework technical recruiters can follow to ensure a seamless and productive interview experience:

Step 1: Understand the subject at hand

  • Develop an understanding of basics of system design and architecture
  • Familiarize yourself with commonly asked systems design interview questions
  • Read about system design case studies for popular applications
  • Structure the questions and problems by increasing magnitude of difficulty

Step 2: Prepare for the interview

  • Plan the extent of the topics and scope of discussion in advance
  • Clearly define the evaluation criteria and communicate expectations
  • Quantify constraints, inputs, boundaries and assumptions
  • Establish the broader context and a detailed scope of the exercise

Step 3: Stay actively involved

  • Ask follow-up questions to challenge a solution
  • Probe candidates to gauge real-time logical reasoning skills
  • Make it a conversation and take notes of important pointers and outcomes
  • Guide candidates with hints and suggestions to steer them in the right direction

Step 4: Be a collaborator

  • Encourage candidates to explore and consider alternative solutions
  • Work with the candidate to drill the problem into smaller tasks
  • Provide context and supporting details to help candidates stay on track
  • Ask follow-up questions to learn about the candidate’s experience

Technical recruiters and hiring managers should aim for providing an environment of positive reinforcement, actionable feedback and encouragement to candidates.

Evaluation Rubric for Candidates

Facilitate Successful System Design Interview Experiences with FaceCode

FaceCode, HackerEarth’s intuitive and secure platform, empowers recruiters to conduct system design interviews in a live coding environment with HD video chat.

FaceCode comes with an interactive diagram board which makes it easier for interviewers to assess the design thinking skills and conduct communication assessments using a built-in library of diagram based questions.

With FaceCode, you can combine your feedback points with AI-powered insights to generate accurate, data-driven assessment reports in a breeze. Plus, you can access interview recordings and transcripts anytime to recall and trace back the interview experience.

Learn how FaceCode can help you conduct system design interviews and boost your hiring efficiency.

How Candidates Use Technology to Cheat in Online Technical Assessments

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers. The ease and...

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring


In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers.

The ease and efficiency of virtual interviews, take home programming tests and remote coding challenges is transformative. Around 82% of companies use pre-employment assessments as reliable indicators of a candidate's skills and potential.

Online skill assessment tests have been proven to streamline technical hiring and enable recruiters to significantly reduce the time and cost to identify and hire top talent.

In the realm of online assessments, remote assessments have transformed the hiring landscape, boosting the speed and efficiency of screening and evaluating talent. On the flip side, candidates have learned how to use creative methods and AI tools to cheat in tests.

As it turns out, technology that makes hiring easier for recruiters and managers - is also their Achilles' heel.

Cheating in Online Assessments is a High Stakes Problem



With the proliferation of AI in recruitment, the conversation around cheating has come to the forefront, putting recruiters and hiring managers in a bit of a flux.



According to research, nearly 30 to 50 percent of candidates cheat in online assessments for entry level jobs. Even 10% of senior candidates have been reportedly caught cheating.

The problem becomes twofold - if finding the right talent can be a competitive advantage, the consequences of hiring the wrong one can be equally damaging and counter-productive.

As per Forbes, a wrong hire can cost a company around 30% of an employee's salary - not to mention, loss of precious productive hours and morale disruption.

The question that arises is - "Can organizations continue to leverage AI-driven tools for online assessments without compromising on the integrity of their hiring process? "

This article will discuss the common methods candidates use to outsmart online assessments. We will also dive deep into actionable steps that you can take to prevent cheating while delivering a positive candidate experience.

Common Cheating Tactics and How You Can Combat Them


  1. Using ChatGPT and other AI tools to write code

    Copy-pasting code using AI-based platforms and online code generators is one of common cheat codes in candidates' books. For tackling technical assessments, candidates conveniently use readily available tools like ChatGPT and GitHub. Using these tools, candidates can easily generate solutions to solve common programming challenges such as:
    • Debugging code
    • Optimizing existing code
    • Writing problem-specific code from scratch
    Ways to prevent it
    • Enable full-screen mode
    • Disable copy-and-paste functionality
    • Restrict tab switching outside of code editors
    • Use AI to detect code that has been copied and pasted
  2. Enlist external help to complete the assessment


    Candidates often seek out someone else to take the assessment on their behalf. In many cases, they also use screen sharing and remote collaboration tools for real-time assistance.

    In extreme cases, some candidates might have an off-camera individual present in the same environment for help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Verify a candidate using video authentication
    • Restrict test access from specific IP addresses
    • Use online proctoring by taking snapshots of the candidate periodically
    • Use a 360 degree environment scan to ensure no unauthorized individual is present
  3. Using multiple devices at the same time


    Candidates attempting to cheat often rely on secondary devices such as a computer, tablet, notebook or a mobile phone hidden from the line of sight of their webcam.

    By using multiple devices, candidates can look up information, search for solutions or simply augment their answers.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Track mouse exit count to detect irregularities
    • Detect when a new device or peripheral is connected
    • Use network monitoring and scanning to detect any smart devices in proximity
    • Conduct a virtual whiteboard interview to monitor movements and gestures
  4. Using remote desktop software and virtual machines


    Tech-savvy candidates go to great lengths to cheat. Using virtual machines, candidates can search for answers using a secondary OS while their primary OS is being monitored.

    Remote desktop software is another cheating technique which lets candidates give access to a third-person, allowing them to control their device.

    With remote desktops, candidates can screen share the test window and use external help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Restrict access to virtual machines
    • AI-based proctoring for identifying malicious keystrokes
    • Use smart browsers to block candidates from using VMs

Future-proof Your Online Assessments With HackerEarth

HackerEarth's AI-powered online proctoring solution is a tested and proven way to outsmart cheating and take preventive measures at the right stage. With HackerEarth's Smart Browser, recruiters can mitigate the threat of cheating and ensure their online assessments are accurate and trustworthy.
  • Secure, sealed-off testing environment
  • AI-enabled live test monitoring
  • Enterprise-grade, industry leading compliance
  • Built-in features to track, detect and flag cheating attempts
Boost your hiring efficiency and conduct reliable online assessments confidently with HackerEarth's revolutionary Smart Browser.
Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo