Home
/
Blog
/
Hiring Strategies
/
Internal Recruitment In Tech: 4 Key Benefits For IT Companies

Internal Recruitment In Tech: 4 Key Benefits For IT Companies

Author
Arpit Mishra
Calendar Icon
December 29, 2017
Timer Icon
8 min read
Share

This article was updated on 3rd April 2023.

Do you speak the language of Gen Z? Their lingo consists of ‘slay’, ‘bet’, ‘vibing’, etc. If that seems alien to you, you wouldn’t be surprised to hear that everything they do is different. From the way they speak, and their dressing styles to the way they approach their careers.

Regardless of growth opportunities, appreciation, or rewards, long careers within a company aren’t a priority for Gen Z. Unlike their/our predecessors who would have continued working for a firm, despite all that. Gen Z just doesn’t ‘vibe’ like that!

So how do you ensure that the current workforce is continuously engaged and willing to stay loyal to your company? How do you enable candidates to see themselves growing and advancing the corporate ladder so that they are not tempted to leave?

By creating a culture of internal recruitment in tech, of course. Whether it is filling a role with a current employee, a promotion, or through a lateral transfer, internal mobility is a great opportunity to improve employee engagement, productivity, and retention.

What is internal recruitment in tech?

Internal recruitment in tech refers to filling vacant job positions with existing employees of a company either through promotions or lateral transfers. It involves looking inward to fill positions rather than hiring someone from the outside.

But why has internal recruitment become so crucial in the last few years and why do companies need to consider it seriously?

One reason why is the growing shortage of skilled talent. The market has become fiercely competitive.

Secondly, post-pandemic, employees are looking for far more than compensation to be satisfied with their job. 52% questioned their purpose at their day-to-day job in a recent Gartner survey.

They are looking for personal value at work. Employees want to make an impact. They also want companies to invest in their growth, provide learning and development opportunities, mental well-being resources, and transparency in company operations.

Indeed, our latest 2022-2023 State of the Developer Ecosystem shows that nearly 16% of developers would like a clear path for career growth in terms of upskilling opportunities.

The key to attempting to retain an employee for a longer duration is by marketing a career with longevity and growth. Let’s look at how internal mobility plays a key role in this.

Also read: Why are Recruiters Switching to Lateral Hiring?

4 key benefits of internal recruitment over external recruitment

Internal Recruitment In tech Vs External Recruitment: The Pros And Cons

Internal hiring is super beneficial for your TA team! They get to add even more qualified candidates to their existing pool of candidates and could potentially, close open roles quickly.

It’s simple math. Assessing internal employees along with passive and active talent outside the company means more people for your recruiters to pick from. Here are some more important benefits of recruiting internally –

#1 Improves employee morale, productivity, and engagement

When employees know that they can apply for positions and take control of their career advancement, it automatically improves productivity fueled by a desire to perform better on the job. This motivates them and further boosts employee morale.

On the contrary, positions that are predominantly filled externally send a message to employees that no matter how hard they work, their credentials and experience are just not good enough to grow within the company.

It’s easier for internal employees to succeed in a new role as they have pre-established connections and knowledge of how things get done in the company.

They also tend to work harder if they know that the company believes in promoting from within. Internal recruitment also helps build a collaborative and agile company culture, which are key aspects of improving employee engagement.

Also read: 7 Employee Engagement Strategies For WFH Tech Teams

#2 Carries low risk of making a bad hire

Companies that prefer recruiting internally understand that the risk with internal hires is lesser compared with ones recruited externally.

They have detailed records of employee performance reviews, compensation, recognition, or awards, along with peer and manager reviews that are reliable predictors of performance. Since they know the no of employees, it helps to avoid employee overload.

Since these jobs are usually filled via self-nomination where candidates express their interest in moving to a new role, the risk of turnover is also considerably lower as employees tend to stay longer.

#3 Costs less than recruiting externally

It is common knowledge that hiring is an expensive activity. The cost per hire is estimated to be around $4000.

This includes external costs such as agency and recruiter fees, job board fees, and internal expenses like recruiter salaries and the money spent on the referral program.

When companies hire from within, they skip all the external costs and most of the internal costs. Internal recruitment in tech is significantly easier on the company’s pockets.

There is also the cost of a bad hire, the likelihood of which is higher with an external recruit.

This is because, unlike an internal hire, there isn’t first-hand information on the employee’s work ethic, critical thinking, leadership abilities, etc., making it difficult to predict the employee’s performance.

#4 Provides quicker results and reduces time-to-hire

Internally hired employees tend to assimilate and deliver results faster.

They are either nominated by the hiring manager or might know someone from the team, which helps them get comfortable with the team faster.

For projects that have imminent deadlines, hiring someone internally results in quicker turnaround times as they are already aware of the processes, systems, and company expectations. Companies also spend less time on-boarding them which saves a lot of time and associated costs.

Also read: Optimize Your Hiring Process With Recruitment Analytics

But what’s the catch with internal recruitment in tech?

If internal hiring is cheaper, faster, and less risky, why aren’t companies able to successfully utilize it more often? There are many internal factors responsible for this.

This can lead to compliance issues

Companies fear that if they continue to select candidates from an internal pool, there is a higher chance of disgruntlement, complaints, and lawsuits filed by employees who are not selected.

Thus, companies rely on self-nomination where employees proactively apply for jobs or positions of interest. While this might sound like a safe alternative, it is also not the best one because in this case very little is done to educate those who might not be actively looking for movement but might be an excellent fit for open positions.

Create resentment among employees

Secondly, the very thing that internal recruitment in tech is supposed to boost can sometimes get adversely impacted – employee morale.

Employees not picked for positions or promotions might feel disheartened and end up looking externally for growth opportunities.

Thirdly, restrictive policies that were once meant to enhance productivity and reduce turnover may become restrictive and claustrophobic to high-caliber employees.

For instance, some companies make it mandatory for employees to have a tenure of one year in their current positions before applying for other roles within the same company.

Sometimes, the employee needs to get additional sign-offs from their managers. Loyal employees who would rather avoid uncomfortable discussions with their bosses are quite unlikely to apply for an internal role. Instead, they would rather take up an external opportunity.

Also read: 10 Key Employee Retention Strategies In Tech

Leave a gap in your existing workforce

Lastly, and probably the biggest factor is pressure from current managers to restrict mobility.

Every manager has those stellar employees on their team who have been around for a long time. They know the processes in and out and are excellent at their jobs.

They are hesitant to nominate them for a different position. Mainly because they are worried about the void that will be created once they leave. It could take ages to fill that role. Managers are not discussing employees’ career advancement plans for fear of losing them.

Also read: How You Can Identify And Close Skill Gaps In Software Development

How to build an effective process to recruit internally?

A lot of the above-mentioned issues arise because companies are being short-sighted in their approach. They focus solely on filling positions rather than investing in candidates.

Let’s change that, shall we?

Speak to your managers – As seen above, managers may not be the best promoters of internal mobility. Educate your managers and conduct training sessions to explain why internal recruitment is beneficial to the company. Also, focus on pointing out how it is directly correlated to employee productivity.

Nomination by the manager – Consider doing away with the clause that a manager has to nominate high-performing team members as candidates for internal roles. This could lead to unconscious bias and favoritism causing further resentment among employees. Your most promising internal candidates may not be able to apply.

Make internal transfers easy – Create a flexible internal transfer policy where the company itself can grant a transfer to a candidate who may be the best bet for an open internal position. Encourage your TA teams to keep the paperwork minimal during an internal transfer.

Create a succession plan – Succession plans refer to internal pipelines maintained by the HR team. They keep a track of skills, training, and performance reviews of existing employees. This helps in pinpointing which employees are ready to fill jobs when they become vacant. HR has the responsibility of building and updating these plans taking into account current and future business needs.

For internal hiring to give positive results, there needs to be a culture that promotes employee development. Encourage internal promotions, open communication with employees about their individual development plans, and a system to close gaps that arise when employees move to different roles.

The Ultimate Playbook For Better Hiring | FREE EBOOK

Internal recruitment vs. External recruitment – Key differences

Internal recruitment: This refers to the process of filling job vacancies within a company with current employees who are seeking new positions or promotions. In tech companies, this might involve shifting a developer to a project management role or promoting an IT analyst to a more senior position.

External recruitment: External recruitment is about hiring candidates from outside the organization. For tech companies, this often means scouting talent from other firms, universities, or through online job portals to find individuals with specialized skills or fresh perspectives.

Comparison:

  • Speed and Cost: Internal recruitment is generally faster and less costly than external, as it skips parts of the hiring process like advertising and initial screenings.
  • Talent Pool: External recruitment offers a broader talent pool, potentially bringing in new skills and ideas, while internal recruitment is limited to existing staff.
  • Employee Morale: Internal recruitment can boost morale and motivation by offering career advancement opportunities. In contrast, external recruitment might sometimes lead to internal dissatisfaction if employees feel overlooked.
  • Onboarding and Adaptation: Internal recruits are already familiar with company culture and processes, requiring less onboarding time compared to external hires.

Internal recruitment is not without its challenges!

Internal recruitment in tech companies is limited to the existing workforce, which might not always have the required skills or experience for certain advanced or specialized roles. This can also lead to:

  • Inbreeding of ideas: Relying solely on internal recruitment can lead to a stagnation of ideas. In tech, where innovation is key, this can be particularly detrimental.
  • Potential for internal conflict: Internal recruitment processes can create competition and conflict among employees, potentially leading to workplace disharmony or feelings of unfairness.
  • Issues with career progression for lower-level employees: If positions are frequently filled internally, it can create a bottleneck where there are no openings for lower-level employees to advance, potentially leading to employee dissatisfaction and turnover.

Look inwards for top talent!

No successful strategy is reliant on any one method. Recruiting externally will never go out of fashion but that doesn’t mean internal recruitment is not beneficial too. Strike a balance between both methods of recruitment to land the best candidates out there.

Here’s the low down.The most promising talent could be right under your nose should you choose to tap into it! Moreover, internal recruitment in tech shows your employees you care about their careers. Your actions show you are willing to put in the effort to retain them.

Since tomorrow’s workforce, mainly Gen Z looks for companies that truly invest in their employees, this is no longer a good-to-have perk. It’s become a high priority.

Let your employees know you want to see them grow in your company 🙂

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Arpit Mishra
Calendar Icon
December 29, 2017
Timer Icon
8 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

Vibe Coding: Shaping the Future of Software

A New Era of CodeVibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today,...

A New Era of Code

Vibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today, when code is produced quickly through AI, the true value lies in designing, refining, and optimizing systems. Our role now goes beyond writing code; we must also ensure that our systems remain efficient and reliable.

From Machine Language to Natural Language

I recall the early days when every line of code was written manually. We progressed from machine language to high-level programming, and now we are beginning to interact with our tools using natural language. This development does not only increase speed but also changes how we approach problem solving. Product managers can now create working demos in hours instead of weeks, and founders have a clearer way of pitching their ideas with functional prototypes. It is important for us to rethink our role as developers and focus on architecture and system design rather than simply on typing c

The Promise and the Pitfalls

I have experienced both sides of vibe coding. In cases where the goal was to build a quick prototype or a simple internal tool, AI-generated code provided impressive results. Teams have been able to test new ideas and validate concepts much faster. However, when it comes to more complex systems that require careful planning and attention to detail, the output from AI can be problematic. I have seen situations where AI produces large volumes of code that become difficult to manage without significant human intervention.

AI-powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot and AWS’s Q Developer have demonstrated significant productivity gains. For instance, at the National Australia Bank, it’s reported that half of the production code is generated by Q Developer, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving . Similarly, platforms like Lovable enable non-coders to build viable tech businesses using natural language prompts, contributing to a shift where AI-generated code reduces the need for large engineering teams. However, there are challenges. AI-generated code can sometimes be verbose or lack the architectural discipline required for complex systems. While AI can rapidly produce prototypes or simple utilities, building large-scale systems still necessitates experienced engineers to refine and optimize the code.​

The Economic Impact

The democratization of code generation is altering the economic landscape of software development. As AI tools become more prevalent, the value of average coding skills may diminish, potentially affecting salaries for entry-level positions. Conversely, developers who excel in system design, architecture, and optimization are likely to see increased demand and compensation.​
Seizing the Opportunity

Vibe coding is most beneficial in areas such as rapid prototyping and building simple applications or internal tools. It frees up valuable time that we can then invest in higher-level tasks such as system architecture, security, and user experience. When used in the right context, AI becomes a helpful partner that accelerates the development process without replacing the need for skilled engineers.

This is revolutionizing our craft, much like the shift from machine language to assembly to high-level languages did in the past. AI can churn out code at lightning speed, but remember, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” Use AI for rapid prototyping, but it’s your expertise that transforms raw output into robust, scalable software. By honing our skills in design and architecture, we ensure our work remains impactful and enduring. Let’s continue to learn, adapt, and build software that stands the test of time.​

Ready to streamline your recruitment process? Get a free demo to explore cutting-edge solutions and resources for your hiring needs.

Guide to Conducting Successful System Design Interviews in 2025

What is Systems Design?Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.Systems Design, in its...

What is Systems Design?

Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.

Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.

Systems Design, in its essence, is a blueprint of how software and applications should work to meet specific goals. The multi-dimensional nature of this discipline makes it open-ended – as there is no single one-size-fits-all solution to a system design problem.

What is a System Design Interview?

Conducting a System Design interview requires recruiters to take an unconventional approach and look beyond right or wrong answers. Recruiters should aim for evaluating a candidate’s ‘systemic thinking’ skills across three key aspects:

How they navigate technical complexity and navigate uncertainty
How they meet expectations of scale, security and speed
How they focus on the bigger picture without losing sight of details

This assessment of the end-to-end thought process and a holistic approach to problem-solving is what the interview should focus on.

What are some common topics for a System Design Interview

System design interview questions are free-form and exploratory in nature where there is no right or best answer to a specific problem statement. Here are some common questions:

How would you approach the design of a social media app or video app?

What are some ways to design a search engine or a ticketing system?

How would you design an API for a payment gateway?

What are some trade-offs and constraints you will consider while designing systems?

What is your rationale for taking a particular approach to problem solving?

Usually, interviewers base the questions depending on the organization, its goals, key competitors and a candidate’s experience level.

For senior roles, the questions tend to focus on assessing the computational thinking, decision making and reasoning ability of a candidate. For entry level job interviews, the questions are designed to test the hard skills required for building a system architecture.

The Difference between a System Design Interview and a Coding Interview

If a coding interview is like a map that takes you from point A to Z – a systems design interview is like a compass which gives you a sense of the right direction.

Here are three key difference between the two:

Coding challenges follow a linear interviewing experience i.e. candidates are given a problem and interaction with recruiters is limited. System design interviews are more lateral and conversational, requiring active participation from interviewers.

Coding interviews or challenges focus on evaluating the technical acumen of a candidate whereas systems design interviews are oriented to assess problem solving and interpersonal skills.

Coding interviews are based on a right/wrong approach with ideal answers to problem statements while a systems design interview focuses on assessing the thought process and the ability to reason from first principles.

How to Conduct an Effective System Design Interview

One common mistake recruiters make is that they approach a system design interview with the expectations and preparation of a typical coding interview.
Here is a four step framework technical recruiters can follow to ensure a seamless and productive interview experience:

Step 1: Understand the subject at hand

  • Develop an understanding of basics of system design and architecture
  • Familiarize yourself with commonly asked systems design interview questions
  • Read about system design case studies for popular applications
  • Structure the questions and problems by increasing magnitude of difficulty

Step 2: Prepare for the interview

  • Plan the extent of the topics and scope of discussion in advance
  • Clearly define the evaluation criteria and communicate expectations
  • Quantify constraints, inputs, boundaries and assumptions
  • Establish the broader context and a detailed scope of the exercise

Step 3: Stay actively involved

  • Ask follow-up questions to challenge a solution
  • Probe candidates to gauge real-time logical reasoning skills
  • Make it a conversation and take notes of important pointers and outcomes
  • Guide candidates with hints and suggestions to steer them in the right direction

Step 4: Be a collaborator

  • Encourage candidates to explore and consider alternative solutions
  • Work with the candidate to drill the problem into smaller tasks
  • Provide context and supporting details to help candidates stay on track
  • Ask follow-up questions to learn about the candidate’s experience

Technical recruiters and hiring managers should aim for providing an environment of positive reinforcement, actionable feedback and encouragement to candidates.

Evaluation Rubric for Candidates

Facilitate Successful System Design Interview Experiences with FaceCode

FaceCode, HackerEarth’s intuitive and secure platform, empowers recruiters to conduct system design interviews in a live coding environment with HD video chat.

FaceCode comes with an interactive diagram board which makes it easier for interviewers to assess the design thinking skills and conduct communication assessments using a built-in library of diagram based questions.

With FaceCode, you can combine your feedback points with AI-powered insights to generate accurate, data-driven assessment reports in a breeze. Plus, you can access interview recordings and transcripts anytime to recall and trace back the interview experience.

Learn how FaceCode can help you conduct system design interviews and boost your hiring efficiency.

How Candidates Use Technology to Cheat in Online Technical Assessments

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers. The ease and...

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring


In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers.

The ease and efficiency of virtual interviews, take home programming tests and remote coding challenges is transformative. Around 82% of companies use pre-employment assessments as reliable indicators of a candidate's skills and potential.

Online skill assessment tests have been proven to streamline technical hiring and enable recruiters to significantly reduce the time and cost to identify and hire top talent.

In the realm of online assessments, remote assessments have transformed the hiring landscape, boosting the speed and efficiency of screening and evaluating talent. On the flip side, candidates have learned how to use creative methods and AI tools to cheat in tests.

As it turns out, technology that makes hiring easier for recruiters and managers - is also their Achilles' heel.

Cheating in Online Assessments is a High Stakes Problem



With the proliferation of AI in recruitment, the conversation around cheating has come to the forefront, putting recruiters and hiring managers in a bit of a flux.



According to research, nearly 30 to 50 percent of candidates cheat in online assessments for entry level jobs. Even 10% of senior candidates have been reportedly caught cheating.

The problem becomes twofold - if finding the right talent can be a competitive advantage, the consequences of hiring the wrong one can be equally damaging and counter-productive.

As per Forbes, a wrong hire can cost a company around 30% of an employee's salary - not to mention, loss of precious productive hours and morale disruption.

The question that arises is - "Can organizations continue to leverage AI-driven tools for online assessments without compromising on the integrity of their hiring process? "

This article will discuss the common methods candidates use to outsmart online assessments. We will also dive deep into actionable steps that you can take to prevent cheating while delivering a positive candidate experience.

Common Cheating Tactics and How You Can Combat Them


  1. Using ChatGPT and other AI tools to write code

    Copy-pasting code using AI-based platforms and online code generators is one of common cheat codes in candidates' books. For tackling technical assessments, candidates conveniently use readily available tools like ChatGPT and GitHub. Using these tools, candidates can easily generate solutions to solve common programming challenges such as:
    • Debugging code
    • Optimizing existing code
    • Writing problem-specific code from scratch
    Ways to prevent it
    • Enable full-screen mode
    • Disable copy-and-paste functionality
    • Restrict tab switching outside of code editors
    • Use AI to detect code that has been copied and pasted
  2. Enlist external help to complete the assessment


    Candidates often seek out someone else to take the assessment on their behalf. In many cases, they also use screen sharing and remote collaboration tools for real-time assistance.

    In extreme cases, some candidates might have an off-camera individual present in the same environment for help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Verify a candidate using video authentication
    • Restrict test access from specific IP addresses
    • Use online proctoring by taking snapshots of the candidate periodically
    • Use a 360 degree environment scan to ensure no unauthorized individual is present
  3. Using multiple devices at the same time


    Candidates attempting to cheat often rely on secondary devices such as a computer, tablet, notebook or a mobile phone hidden from the line of sight of their webcam.

    By using multiple devices, candidates can look up information, search for solutions or simply augment their answers.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Track mouse exit count to detect irregularities
    • Detect when a new device or peripheral is connected
    • Use network monitoring and scanning to detect any smart devices in proximity
    • Conduct a virtual whiteboard interview to monitor movements and gestures
  4. Using remote desktop software and virtual machines


    Tech-savvy candidates go to great lengths to cheat. Using virtual machines, candidates can search for answers using a secondary OS while their primary OS is being monitored.

    Remote desktop software is another cheating technique which lets candidates give access to a third-person, allowing them to control their device.

    With remote desktops, candidates can screen share the test window and use external help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Restrict access to virtual machines
    • AI-based proctoring for identifying malicious keystrokes
    • Use smart browsers to block candidates from using VMs

Future-proof Your Online Assessments With HackerEarth

HackerEarth's AI-powered online proctoring solution is a tested and proven way to outsmart cheating and take preventive measures at the right stage. With HackerEarth's Smart Browser, recruiters can mitigate the threat of cheating and ensure their online assessments are accurate and trustworthy.
  • Secure, sealed-off testing environment
  • AI-enabled live test monitoring
  • Enterprise-grade, industry leading compliance
  • Built-in features to track, detect and flag cheating attempts
Boost your hiring efficiency and conduct reliable online assessments confidently with HackerEarth's revolutionary Smart Browser.
Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo