Home
/
Blog
/
Tech Tutorials
/
Deep Learning & Parameter Tuning with MXnet, H2o Package in R

Deep Learning & Parameter Tuning with MXnet, H2o Package in R

Author
Manish Saraswat
Calendar Icon
January 30, 2017
Timer Icon
48 min read
Share
from the UC Irivine ML repository. Let's start with H2O. This data set isn't the most ideal one to work with in neural networks. However, the motive of this hands-on section is to make you familiar with model-building processes.

H2O Package

H2O package provides h2o.deeplearning function for model building. It is built on Java. Primarily, this function is useful to build multilayer feedforward neural networks. It is enabled with several features such as the following:
  • Multi-threaded distributed parallel computation
  • Adaptive learning rate (or step size) for faster convergence
  • Regularization options such as L1 and L2 which help prevent overfitting
  • Automatic missing value imputation
  • Hyperparameter optimization using grid/random search
There are many more!For optimization, this package uses the hogwild method instead of stochastic gradient descent. Hogwild is just parallelized version of SGD.Let's understand the parameters involved in model building with h2o. Both the packages have different nomenclatures, so make sure you don't get confused. Since most of the parameters are easy to understand by their names, I'll mention the important ones:
  1. hidden - It specifies the number of hidden layers and number of neurons in each layer in the architechture.
  2. epochs - It specifies the number of iterations to be done on the data set.
  3. rate - It specifies the learning rate.
  4. activation - It specifies the type of activation function to use. In h2o, the major activation functions are Tanh, Rectifier, and Maxout.
Let's quickly load the data and get over with sanitary data pre-processing steps:
path = "~/mydata/deeplearning"
setwd(path)
#load libraries
library(data.table)
library(mlr)
#set variable names
setcol <- c("age",
"workclass",
"fnlwgt",
"education",
"education-num",
"marital-status",
"occupation",
"relationship",
"race",
"sex",
"capital-gain",
"capital-loss",
"hours-per-week",
"native-country",
"target")
#load data
train <- read.table("adultdata.txt",header = F,sep = ",",col.names = setcol,na.strings = c(" ?"),stringsAsFactors = F)
test <- read.table("adulttest.txt",header = F,sep = ",",col.names = setcol,skip = 1, na.strings = c(" ?"),stringsAsFactors = F)
setDT(train)
setDT(test)
#Data Sanity
dim(train) #32561 X 15
dim(test) #16281 X 15
str(train)
str(test)
#check missing values
table(is.na(train))
sapply(train, function(x) sum(is.na(x))/length(x))*100
table(is.na(test))
sapply(test, function(x) sum(is.na(x))/length(x))*100
#check target variable
#binary in nature check if data is imbalanced
train[,.N/nrow(train),target]
test[,.N/nrow(test),target]
#remove extra characters
test[,target := substr(target,start = 1,stop = nchar(target)-1)]
#remove leading whitespace
library(stringr)
char_col <- colnames(train)[sapply(test,is.character)]
for(i in char_col)
set(train,j=i,value = str_trim(train[[i]],side = "left"))
#set all character variables as factor
fact_col <- colnames(train)[sapply(train,is.character)]
for(i in fact_col)
set(train,j=i,value = factor(train[[i]]))
for(i in fact_col)
set(test,j=i,value = factor(test[[i]]))
#impute missing values
imp1 <- impute(data = train,target = "target",classes = list(integer = imputeMedian(), factor = imputeMode()))
imp2 <- impute(data = test,target = "target",classes = list(integer = imputeMedian(), factor = imputeMode()))
train <- setDT(imp1$data)
test <- setDT(imp2$data)
view raw DL1_H2o.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


Now, let's build a simple deep learning model. Generally, computing variable importance from a trained deep learning model is quite pain staking. But, h2o package provides an effortless function to compute variable importance from a deep learning model.

#load the package
require(h2o)
#start h2o
localH2o <- h2o.init(nthreads = -1, max_mem_size = "20G")
#load data on H2o
trainh2o <- as.h2o(train)
testh2o <- as.h2o(test)
#set variables
y <- "target"
x <- setdiff(colnames(trainh2o),y)
#train the model - without hidden layer
deepmodel <- h2o.deeplearning(x = x
,y = y
,training_frame = trainh2o
,standardize = T
,model_id = "deep_model"
,activation = "Rectifier"
,epochs = 100
,seed = 1
,nfolds = 5
,variable_importances = T)
#compute variable importance and performance
h2o.varimp_plot(deepmodel,num_of_features = 20)
h2o.performance(deepmodel,xval = T) #84.5 % CV accuracy
view raw DL2.H2o.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


deep learning variable importance

Now, let's train a deep learning model with one hidden layer comprising five neurons. This time instead of checking the cross-validation accuracy, we'll validate the model on test data.

deepmodel <- h2o.deeplearning(x = x
,y = y
,training_frame = trainh2o
,validation_frame = testh2o
,standardize = T
,model_id = "deep_model"
,activation = "Rectifier"
,epochs = 100
,seed = 1
,hidden = 5
,variable_importances = T)
h2o.performance(deepmodel,valid = T) #85.6%
view raw DL3_H2o.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


For hyperparameter tuning, we'll perform a random grid search over all parameters and choose the model which returns highest accuracy.

#set parameter space
activation_opt <- c("Rectifier","RectifierWithDropout", "Maxout","MaxoutWithDropout")
hidden_opt <- list(c(10,10),c(20,15),c(50,50,50))
l1_opt <- c(0,1e-3,1e-5)
l2_opt <- c(0,1e-3,1e-5)
hyper_params <- list( activation=activation_opt,
hidden=hidden_opt,
l1=l1_opt,
l2=l2_opt )
#set search criteria
search_criteria <- list(strategy = "RandomDiscrete", max_models=10)
#train model
dl_grid <- h2o.grid("deeplearning"
,grid_id = "deep_learn"
,hyper_params = hyper_params
,search_criteria = search_criteria
,training_frame = trainh2o
,x=x
,y=y
,nfolds = 5
,epochs = 100)
#get best model
d_grid <- h2o.getGrid("deep_learn",sort_by = "accuracy")
best_dl_model <- h2o.getModel(d_grid@model_ids[[1]])
h2o.performance (best_dl_model,xval = T) #CV Accuracy - 84.7%
view raw DL4.H2o.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub

MXNetR Package

The mxnet package provides an incredible interface to build feedforward NN, recurrent NN and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNNs are being widely used in detecting objects from images. The team that created xgboost also created this package. Currently, mxnet is being popularly used in kaggle competitions for image classification problems.

This package can be easily connected with GPUs as well. The process of building model architecture is quite intuitive. It gives greater control to configure the neural network manually.

Let's get some hands-on experience using this package.Follow the commands below to install this package in your respective OS. For Windows and Linux users, installation commands are given below. For Mac users, here's the installation procedure.

# # Installation - Windows
install.packages("drat", repos="https://cran.rstudio.com")
drat:::addRepo("dmlc")
install.packages("mxnet")
library(mxnet)
#Installation - Linux
#Press Ctrl + Alt + T and run the following command
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -y install git
git clone https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet.git ~/mxnet --recursive
cd ~/mxnet/setup-utils
bash install-mxnet-ubuntu-r.sh
view raw mxnet1.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


In R, mxnet accepts target variables as numeric classes and not factors. Also, it accepts data frame as a matrix. Now, we'll make the required changes:

#load package
require(mxnet)
#convert target variables into numeric
train[,target := as.numeric(target)-1]
test[,target := as.numeric(target)-1]
#convert train data to matrix
train.x <- data.matrix(train[,-c("target"),with=F])
train.y <- train$target
#convert test data to matrix
test.x <- data.matrix(test[,-c("target"),with=F])
test.y <- test$target
view raw mxnet2.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


Now, we'll train the multilayered perceptron model using the mx.mlp function.

#set seed to reproduce results
mx.set.seed(1)
mlpmodel <- mx.mlp(data = train.x
,label = train.y
,hidden_node = 3 #one layer with 10 nodes
,out_node = 2
,out_activation = "softmax" #softmax return probability
,num.round = 100 #number of iterations over training data
,array.batch.size = 20 #after every batch weights will get updated
,learning.rate = 0.03 #same as step size
,eval.metric= mx.metric.accuracy
,eval.data = list(data = test.x, label = test.y))
view raw mxnet3.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


Softmax function is used for binary and multi-classification problems. Alternatively, you can also manually craft the model structure.

#create NN structure
data <- mx.symbol.Variable("data")
fc1 <- mx.symbol.FullyConnected(data, num_hidden=3) #3 neuron in one layer
lrm <- mx.symbol.SoftmaxOutput(fc1)
view raw mxnet4.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


We have configured the network above with one hidden layer carrying three neurons. We have chosen softmax as the output function. The network optimizes for squared loss for regression, and the network optimizes for classification accuracy for classification. Now, we'll train the network:

nnmodel <- mx.model.FeedForward.create(symbol = lrm
,X = train.x
,y = train.y
,ctx = mx.cpu()
,num.round = 100
,eval.metric = mx.metric.accuracy
,array.batch.size = 50
,learning.rate = 0.01)
view raw mxnet5.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


Similarly, we can configure a more complexed network fed with hidden layers.

#configure another network
data <- mx.symbol.Variable("data")
fc1 <- mx.symbol.FullyConnected(data, name = "fc1", num_hidden=10) #1st hidden layer
act1 <- mx.symbol.Activation(fc1, name = "sig", act_type="relu")
fc2 <- mx.symbol.FullyConnected(act1, name = "fc2", num_hidden=2) #2nd hidden layer
out <- mx.symbol.SoftmaxOutput(fc2, name = "soft")
view raw mxnet6.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


Understand it carefully: After feeding the input through data, the first hidden layer consists of 10 neurons. The output of each neuron passes through a relu (rectified linear) activation function. We have used it in place of sigmoid. relu converges faster than a sigmoid function. You can read more about relu here.

Then, the output is fed into the second layer which is the output layer. Since our target variable has two classes, we've chosen num_hidden as 2 in the second layer. Finally, the output from second layer is made to pass though softmax output function.

#train the network
dp_model <- mx.model.FeedForward.create(symbol = out
,X = train.x
,y = train.y
,ctx = mx.cpu()
,num.round = 100
,eval.metric = mx.metric.accuracy
,array.batch.size = 50
,learning.rate = 0.005)
view raw mxnet7.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


As mentioned above, this trained model predicts output probability, which can be easily transformed into a label using a threshold value (say, 0.5). To make predictions on the test set, we do this:

#predict on test
pred_dp <- predict(dp_model,test.x)
str(pred_dp) #contains 2 rows and 16281 columns
#transpose the pred matrix
pred.val <- max.col(t(pred_dp))-1
view raw mxnet8.R hosted with ❤ by GitHub


The predicted matrix returns two rows and 16281 columns, each column carrying probability. Using the max.col function, we can extract the maximum value from each row. If you check the model's accuracy, you'll find that this network performs terribly on this data. In fact, it gives no better result than the train accuracy! On this data set, xgboost tuning gave 87% accuracy!

If you are familiar with the model building process, I'd suggest you to try working on the popular MNIST data set. You can find tons of tutorials on this data to get you going!

Summary

Deep Learning is getting increasingly popular in solving most complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, etc. If you are aspiring for a career in machine learning, this is the best time for you to get into this subject. The motive of this article was to introduce you to the fundamental concepts of deep learning.In this article, we learned about the basics of deep learning (perceptrons, neural networks, and multilayered neural networks). We learned deep learning as a technique is composed of several algorithms such as backpropagration and gradient descent to optimize the networks. In the end, we gained some hands-on experience in developing deep learning models.Do let me know if you have any feedback, suggestions, or thoughts on this article in the comments below!

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Manish Saraswat
Calendar Icon
January 30, 2017
Timer Icon
48 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

Vibe Coding: Shaping the Future of Software

A New Era of CodeVibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today,...

A New Era of Code

Vibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today, when code is produced quickly through AI, the true value lies in designing, refining, and optimizing systems. Our role now goes beyond writing code; we must also ensure that our systems remain efficient and reliable.

From Machine Language to Natural Language

I recall the early days when every line of code was written manually. We progressed from machine language to high-level programming, and now we are beginning to interact with our tools using natural language. This development does not only increase speed but also changes how we approach problem solving. Product managers can now create working demos in hours instead of weeks, and founders have a clearer way of pitching their ideas with functional prototypes. It is important for us to rethink our role as developers and focus on architecture and system design rather than simply on typing code.

The Promise and the Pitfalls

I have experienced both sides of vibe coding. In cases where the goal was to build a quick prototype or a simple internal tool, AI-generated code provided impressive results. Teams have been able to test new ideas and validate concepts much faster. However, when it comes to more complex systems that require careful planning and attention to detail, the output from AI can be problematic. I have seen situations where AI produces large volumes of code that become difficult to manage without significant human intervention.

AI-powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot and AWS’s Q Developer have demonstrated significant productivity gains. For instance, at the National Australia Bank, it’s reported that half of the production code is generated by Q Developer, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving . Similarly, platforms like Lovable enable non-coders to build viable tech businesses using natural language prompts, contributing to a shift where AI-generated code reduces the need for large engineering teams. However, there are challenges. AI-generated code can sometimes be verbose or lack the architectural discipline required for complex systems. While AI can rapidly produce prototypes or simple utilities, building large-scale systems still necessitates experienced engineers to refine and optimize the code.​

The Economic Impact

The democratization of code generation is altering the economic landscape of software development. As AI tools become more prevalent, the value of average coding skills may diminish, potentially affecting salaries for entry-level positions. Conversely, developers who excel in system design, architecture, and optimization are likely to see increased demand and compensation.​
Seizing the Opportunity

Vibe coding is most beneficial in areas such as rapid prototyping and building simple applications or internal tools. It frees up valuable time that we can then invest in higher-level tasks such as system architecture, security, and user experience. When used in the right context, AI becomes a helpful partner that accelerates the development process without replacing the need for skilled engineers.

This is revolutionizing our craft, much like the shift from machine language to assembly to high-level languages did in the past. AI can churn out code at lightning speed, but remember, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” Use AI for rapid prototyping, but it’s your expertise that transforms raw output into robust, scalable software. By honing our skills in design and architecture, we ensure our work remains impactful and enduring. Let’s continue to learn, adapt, and build software that stands the test of time.​

Ready to streamline your recruitment process? Get a free demo to explore cutting-edge solutions and resources for your hiring needs.

Guide to Conducting Successful System Design Interviews in 2025

What is Systems Design?Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.Systems Design, in its...

What is Systems Design?

Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.

Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.

Systems Design, in its essence, is a blueprint of how software and applications should work to meet specific goals. The multi-dimensional nature of this discipline makes it open-ended – as there is no single one-size-fits-all solution to a system design problem.

What is a System Design Interview?

Conducting a System Design interview requires recruiters to take an unconventional approach and look beyond right or wrong answers. Recruiters should aim for evaluating a candidate’s ‘systemic thinking’ skills across three key aspects:

How they navigate technical complexity and navigate uncertainty
How they meet expectations of scale, security and speed
How they focus on the bigger picture without losing sight of details

This assessment of the end-to-end thought process and a holistic approach to problem-solving is what the interview should focus on.

What are some common topics for a System Design Interview

System design interview questions are free-form and exploratory in nature where there is no right or best answer to a specific problem statement. Here are some common questions:

How would you approach the design of a social media app or video app?

What are some ways to design a search engine or a ticketing system?

How would you design an API for a payment gateway?

What are some trade-offs and constraints you will consider while designing systems?

What is your rationale for taking a particular approach to problem solving?

Usually, interviewers base the questions depending on the organization, its goals, key competitors and a candidate’s experience level.

For senior roles, the questions tend to focus on assessing the computational thinking, decision making and reasoning ability of a candidate. For entry level job interviews, the questions are designed to test the hard skills required for building a system architecture.

The Difference between a System Design Interview and a Coding Interview

If a coding interview is like a map that takes you from point A to Z – a systems design interview is like a compass which gives you a sense of the right direction.

Here are three key difference between the two:

Coding challenges follow a linear interviewing experience i.e. candidates are given a problem and interaction with recruiters is limited. System design interviews are more lateral and conversational, requiring active participation from interviewers.

Coding interviews or challenges focus on evaluating the technical acumen of a candidate whereas systems design interviews are oriented to assess problem solving and interpersonal skills.

Coding interviews are based on a right/wrong approach with ideal answers to problem statements while a systems design interview focuses on assessing the thought process and the ability to reason from first principles.

How to Conduct an Effective System Design Interview

One common mistake recruiters make is that they approach a system design interview with the expectations and preparation of a typical coding interview.
Here is a four step framework technical recruiters can follow to ensure a seamless and productive interview experience:

Step 1: Understand the subject at hand

  • Develop an understanding of basics of system design and architecture
  • Familiarize yourself with commonly asked systems design interview questions
  • Read about system design case studies for popular applications
  • Structure the questions and problems by increasing magnitude of difficulty

Step 2: Prepare for the interview

  • Plan the extent of the topics and scope of discussion in advance
  • Clearly define the evaluation criteria and communicate expectations
  • Quantify constraints, inputs, boundaries and assumptions
  • Establish the broader context and a detailed scope of the exercise

Step 3: Stay actively involved

  • Ask follow-up questions to challenge a solution
  • Probe candidates to gauge real-time logical reasoning skills
  • Make it a conversation and take notes of important pointers and outcomes
  • Guide candidates with hints and suggestions to steer them in the right direction

Step 4: Be a collaborator

  • Encourage candidates to explore and consider alternative solutions
  • Work with the candidate to drill the problem into smaller tasks
  • Provide context and supporting details to help candidates stay on track
  • Ask follow-up questions to learn about the candidate’s experience

Technical recruiters and hiring managers should aim for providing an environment of positive reinforcement, actionable feedback and encouragement to candidates.

Evaluation Rubric for Candidates

Facilitate Successful System Design Interview Experiences with FaceCode

FaceCode, HackerEarth’s intuitive and secure platform, empowers recruiters to conduct system design interviews in a live coding environment with HD video chat.

FaceCode comes with an interactive diagram board which makes it easier for interviewers to assess the design thinking skills and conduct communication assessments using a built-in library of diagram based questions.

With FaceCode, you can combine your feedback points with AI-powered insights to generate accurate, data-driven assessment reports in a breeze. Plus, you can access interview recordings and transcripts anytime to recall and trace back the interview experience.

Learn how FaceCode can help you conduct system design interviews and boost your hiring efficiency.

How Candidates Use Technology to Cheat in Online Technical Assessments

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers. The ease and...

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring


In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers.

The ease and efficiency of virtual interviews, take home programming tests and remote coding challenges is transformative. Around 82% of companies use pre-employment assessments as reliable indicators of a candidate's skills and potential.

Online skill assessment tests have been proven to streamline technical hiring and enable recruiters to significantly reduce the time and cost to identify and hire top talent.

In the realm of online assessments, remote assessments have transformed the hiring landscape, boosting the speed and efficiency of screening and evaluating talent. On the flip side, candidates have learned how to use creative methods and AI tools to cheat in tests.

As it turns out, technology that makes hiring easier for recruiters and managers - is also their Achilles' heel.

Cheating in Online Assessments is a High Stakes Problem



With the proliferation of AI in recruitment, the conversation around cheating has come to the forefront, putting recruiters and hiring managers in a bit of a flux.



According to research, nearly 30 to 50 percent of candidates cheat in online assessments for entry level jobs. Even 10% of senior candidates have been reportedly caught cheating.

The problem becomes twofold - if finding the right talent can be a competitive advantage, the consequences of hiring the wrong one can be equally damaging and counter-productive.

As per Forbes, a wrong hire can cost a company around 30% of an employee's salary - not to mention, loss of precious productive hours and morale disruption.

The question that arises is - "Can organizations continue to leverage AI-driven tools for online assessments without compromising on the integrity of their hiring process? "

This article will discuss the common methods candidates use to outsmart online assessments. We will also dive deep into actionable steps that you can take to prevent cheating while delivering a positive candidate experience.

Common Cheating Tactics and How You Can Combat Them


  1. Using ChatGPT and other AI tools to write code

    Copy-pasting code using AI-based platforms and online code generators is one of common cheat codes in candidates' books. For tackling technical assessments, candidates conveniently use readily available tools like ChatGPT and GitHub. Using these tools, candidates can easily generate solutions to solve common programming challenges such as:
    • Debugging code
    • Optimizing existing code
    • Writing problem-specific code from scratch
    Ways to prevent it
    • Enable full-screen mode
    • Disable copy-and-paste functionality
    • Restrict tab switching outside of code editors
    • Use AI to detect code that has been copied and pasted
  2. Enlist external help to complete the assessment


    Candidates often seek out someone else to take the assessment on their behalf. In many cases, they also use screen sharing and remote collaboration tools for real-time assistance.

    In extreme cases, some candidates might have an off-camera individual present in the same environment for help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Verify a candidate using video authentication
    • Restrict test access from specific IP addresses
    • Use online proctoring by taking snapshots of the candidate periodically
    • Use a 360 degree environment scan to ensure no unauthorized individual is present
  3. Using multiple devices at the same time


    Candidates attempting to cheat often rely on secondary devices such as a computer, tablet, notebook or a mobile phone hidden from the line of sight of their webcam.

    By using multiple devices, candidates can look up information, search for solutions or simply augment their answers.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Track mouse exit count to detect irregularities
    • Detect when a new device or peripheral is connected
    • Use network monitoring and scanning to detect any smart devices in proximity
    • Conduct a virtual whiteboard interview to monitor movements and gestures
  4. Using remote desktop software and virtual machines


    Tech-savvy candidates go to great lengths to cheat. Using virtual machines, candidates can search for answers using a secondary OS while their primary OS is being monitored.

    Remote desktop software is another cheating technique which lets candidates give access to a third-person, allowing them to control their device.

    With remote desktops, candidates can screen share the test window and use external help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Restrict access to virtual machines
    • AI-based proctoring for identifying malicious keystrokes
    • Use smart browsers to block candidates from using VMs

Future-proof Your Online Assessments With HackerEarth

HackerEarth's AI-powered online proctoring solution is a tested and proven way to outsmart cheating and take preventive measures at the right stage. With HackerEarth's Smart Browser, recruiters can mitigate the threat of cheating and ensure their online assessments are accurate and trustworthy.
  • Secure, sealed-off testing environment
  • AI-enabled live test monitoring
  • Enterprise-grade, industry leading compliance
  • Built-in features to track, detect and flag cheating attempts
Boost your hiring efficiency and conduct reliable online assessments confidently with HackerEarth's revolutionary Smart Browser.
Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo