Home
/
Blog
/
DEI Hiring
/
6 advantages of using online assessment in education

6 advantages of using online assessment in education

Author
Arpit Mishra
Calendar Icon
November 29, 2017
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

Explore this post with:

A vestige of a by-gone colonial era, our modern-day education system, with its outdated teaching methodology and questionable assessment modules, is in dire need of an overhaul.

Although it permeates our everyday lives, technology in education is yet to impact our systems in an effective and meaningful manner.

If one were to compare today’s classrooms to those 20 or 30 years back, there wouldn’t be any substantial difference in the way subjects were taught or the assessment methodologies adopted to gauge its effectiveness.

The latter in particular has been completely unaffected by technology, and we are going to explore the reasons behind this.

Why the unwillingness to adopt online assessment in education?

A majority of professors use technology in education primarily to better plan their lessons and make more engaging presentations.

When it comes to tests or assessments, however, they opt for the same antiquated pen-and-paper routine.

While it is understandable that you shun technology to assess a literature paper, it is difficult to understand why technology is not judiciously used to assess students of engineering or similar technical streams.

Let’s look at some of the reasons and possible solutions to address them.

  1. Lack of training

    According to a 2006 study by Hew and Brush, one of the primary obstacles to adopting technology in education was inadequate knowledge and skills.

    A prerequisite for using traditional software tools was a fair amount of technical know-how and skill.

    Those unfortunate ones who weren’t in possession of such skills had to be trained to use these tools, which was a time consuming and expensive affair and might explain the reluctance that most educational institutions have towards adopting such technology extensively.

    However, the newer breed of technology tools, with their intuitive designs and interface, and faster onboarding experience makes it effortless to adapt and adopt.

  2. Pressure to confirm

    The brave souls who do try to do things differently are almost always frowned upon by traditionalists, who are reluctant to change their ways.

    There are two possible outcomes to being subjected to this sort of pressure — they either keep fighting the good fight till others see merit in their newer ways, or they succumb to the pressure and give up.

    However, a technology that is effortless to operate can help in turning even the hardest cynics into supporters of technical assessments

  3. Changes needed at a policy level

    In any classroom, there are typically two forms of assessments conducted — formative, conducted over the course of teaching to monitor student learning, and summative that are the standard tests or exams conducted at the end of a term or semester to evaluate student learning by comparing it against a benchmark.

    While colleges or schools can take liberties by conducting formative assessments to gauge how well a student understands a concept, it cannot substitute a tech assessment with a summative one that is conducted in accordance with the board of education, unless thus approved by the board.

    Changes at a policy level to technically transform traditional assessment, however, can ensure that our students are assessed effectively and comprehensively.

  4. Test-centric mindset needs to change

    At a very fundamental level, we define academic achievement by how well someone does on a standardized test.

    Our education system is also designed to help achieve better test results rather than helping students understand a concept clearly.

    Introducing a tech assessment model requires a shift in mindset where we assess the student to better understand his weak areas and strengths and then use those parameters to design teaching to be most effective.

    Most technical assessment tools come built-in with data-driven analytics that allows its users to comprehensively analyze the progress made by each student.

    Such comprehensive and relevant reports can go a long way in convincing our educators to change their approach towards assessments in general.

Benefits of online assessment tools in education

Creating assessments for the entire class, not once or twice a year but repeatedly year after year is a tedious routine that our teachers/professors undertake.

However, their work doesn’t end there.

After creating these assessments in a variety of forms, the next task is grading them and providing appropriate feedback for the entire class and that too, in a timely manner.

It is in this context that digital tools come in handy.

technology in education, Advantages of using online assessment for students, online assessment, online assessment for students
Assessment and feedback lifecycle as described by Ros Smith and Lisa Gray

Authors Ros Smith and Lisa Gray’s 2016 guide on enhancing assessment through technology explains the lifecycle of assessment and feedback.

According to them, most educators use technology mostly during the ‘Supporting’ stage of the lifecycle, whereas, technology can add considerable value at the ‘Submitting’, ‘Marking and production of feedback’ stages as well.

For instance, during the submitting stage, not only can the software give reminders of upcoming submission date, but students can also conveniently submit their assignment online without having to physically hand-in their assignments.

During the marking and feedback stages, educators are presented with the advantage of not having to carry around the bulky bundles of assessments, and instead access it online anywhere.

Tech assessments also ensure consistency in marking, along with the option to provide written, audio or video feedback comments.

Let’s explore a few other advantages of using online assessment tools.

  1. Built-in flexibility to assess an array of skills and competence

    The design flexibility that most tech assessments come with, presents educators with the opportunity to assess a wide range of skills and competency in their students that are far and beyond what any standardized test can offer.

    Apart from testing students on a range of skills, this type of online assessment tool closely simulates real-world scenarios.

  2. Transparency in marking

    Tech assessments typically come programmed with the option to specify marking criteria, based on which tests are typically graded.

    These criteria are transparent to all and make for an unbiased and impartial grading system.

  3. Delivery schedule can be timed

    Online assessments tools can be customized to deliver assessments as per a specific schedule (bimonthly or weekly, for instance) with minimal input from teachers, thus offloading a lot of their workload.

    Apart from a delivery schedule, these assessments can be customized to automatically mark or grade the submissions, further reducing the workload for the teachers and making the grading system more efficient.

  4. Enables deeper learning

    Thanks to the efficiency of such assessments coupled with its precise feedback, students, and teachers can target both strengths and weakness and promote deeper learning of concepts.

    This form of learning builds genuine interest to pursue a subject which also reflects in improved results in subsequent assessments.

  5. Customizationfor students with disabilities or learning difficulties

    Technology can make it simpler for students with disabilities or learning difficulties to perform better during assessments by customizing it as per their needs or requirements.

    For instance, one can opt to take the assessment in an audio/visual format, or customize the presentation of the assessment by tweaking the font, text size, etc as per individual need, thus ensuring a level playing field for all those involved.

  6. Other benefits of online assessment tools

    Apart from the above-mentioned benefits, tech assisted assessments also gives students the opportunity to access it from anywhere or anytime.

    Ease of customization also ensures that based on statistics of performance, each course module can be tweaked as required.

    The timely manner in which results are published also enables teachers to review their lessons and courses much more effectively.

Using the right online assessment in education for the right purpose at the right time

While the merits far outweigh any drawbacks that this form of online assessment has, the main concern many expresses is regarding the technical support required in an event of a software issue cropping up.

This would delay a scheduled assessment from taking place and throw a spanner into a process that has been set in motion.

There is also some concern about how technology can bring about a more pronounced student-teacher gap because of the high levels of automation possible in these tools.

But what we all need to realize is that technology is a double-edged sword, there are bound to be several concerns over such a large-scale implementation, but if used judiciously and with discretion, it has the power to unlock a gold mine of opportunities.

While top companies like Amazon, Walmart, Accenture, and other fortunes 500 companies are building campus recruitment strategies.

It is essential for school and universities to train their students for the assessment of futures.

Learn how HackerEarth had helped Universities develop their learning and development program with online Assessment

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Arpit Mishra
Calendar Icon
November 29, 2017
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

What It Takes to Keep Gen Z Engaged and Growing at Work

What It Takes to Keep Gen Z Engaged and Growing at Work

Engaging Gen Z employees is no longer an HR checkbox. It's a competitive advantage.

Companies that get this right aren’t just filling roles. They’re building future-ready teams, deepening loyalty, and winning the talent market before competitors even realize they’re losing it.

Why Gen Z is Rewriting the Rules

Gen Z didn’t just enter the workforce. They arrived with a different operating system.

  • They’ve grown up with instant access, real-time feedback, and limitless choice. When work feels slow, rigid, or disconnected, they don’t wait it out. They move on. Retention becomes a live problem, not a future one.
  • They expect technology to be intuitive and fast, communication to be direct and low-friction, and their employer to reflect values in daily action, not just annual reports.

The consequence: Outdated systems and poor employee experiences don’t just frustrate Gen Z. They accelerate attrition.

Millennials vs Gen Z: Similar Generation, Different Expectations

These two cohorts are often grouped together. They shouldn’t be.

The distinction matters because solutions designed for Millennials often fall flat for Gen Z. Understanding who you’re designing for is where effective engagement strategy begins.

Gen Z’s Relationship with Loyalty

Loyalty, for Gen Z, is earned, not assumed.

  • They challenge outdated processes and push for tech-enabled workflows.
  • They constantly evaluate whether their current role offers the growth, flexibility, and purpose they need. If it doesn’t, they start looking elsewhere.

Key insight: This isn’t disloyalty. It’s clarity about what they want. Organizations that align experiences with these expectations gain a competitive edge.

  • High turnover is the cost of ignoring this.
  • Stronger teams are the reward for getting it right.

What Actually Works

1. Rethink Workplace Technology

  • Outdated tools may be invisible to older employees, but Gen Z sees them immediately.
  • Modern HR tech and collaboration platforms improve efficiency and signal investment in people.
  • Invest in tools that reduce friction and enhance daily experience, not just track performance.

2. Flexibility with Clear Accountability

  • Gen Z values autonomy, but also needs clarity to thrive.
  • Hybrid and remote models work when paired with well-defined goals and explicit ownership.
  • Focus on outcomes, not hours. Autonomy with accountability is a combination Gen Z respects.

3. Continuous Feedback, Not Annual Reviews

  • Annual performance reviews feel outdated. Gen Z expects real-time feedback loops.
  • Frequent, actionable feedback helps employees improve faster and signals that their growth matters.
  • Make feedback a weekly habit, not a twice-yearly event.

4. Make Growth Visible

  • If career paths aren’t clear, Gen Z won’t wait. They’ll look elsewhere.
  • Internal mobility, structured learning paths, and reskilling opportunities signal future potential.
  • Invest in learning and development and make career trajectories explicit.

5. Build Real Belonging

  • Inclusion must show up in daily interactions, not just company values documents.
  • Inclusive environments where diverse perspectives are genuinely sought produce better decisions and stronger engagement.
  • Gen Z quickly notices when DEI is performative. Build it into everyday interactions.

6. Connect Work to Purpose

  • Gen Z wants to see how their work matters in a direct, traceable way.
  • Linking individual roles to tangible business outcomes increases ownership and engagement.
  • Purpose-driven work isn’t a perk. It’s a retention strategy.

7. Prioritize Well-Being

  • Burnout is a performance problem before it becomes attrition.
  • Mental health support, sustainable workloads, and genuine flexibility reduce stress and sustain engagement.
  • Policies must be real in practice. Gaps erode trust.

How to Attract Gen Z from the Start

Job Descriptions That Tell the Truth

  • Generic postings don’t convert Gen Z candidates. They want specifics: remote or hybrid expectations, real growth opportunities, and culture in practice.
  • Transparent job descriptions attract better-fit candidates and reduce early attrition.

Skills Over Experience

  • Gen Z and organizations hiring them increasingly value potential over tenure.
  • Skills-based hiring opens access to a broader, more diverse talent pool and builds teams equipped for change.
  • Hire for capability and future-readiness, not just years on a resume.

The Bottom Line

Retaining Gen Z isn’t about perks. It’s about rethinking the employee experience from the ground up.

  • Flexibility without accountability fails.
  • Purpose without visibility is hollow.
  • Growth that isn’t visible or structured drives attrition faster than most organizations realize.

The payoff: When organizations combine the right technology, real flexibility, continuous feedback, visible growth paths, and genuine inclusion:

  • Gen Z doesn’t just stay. They perform at a higher level.
  • Adaptive, future-forward thinking compounds over time.

That’s what separates organizations that thrive in today’s talent market from those constantly replacing people who left for somewhere better.

AI Tools for HR Managers in 2026: What's Actually Working (And What Isn't)

AI Tools for HR Managers in 2026: What's Actually Working (And What Isn't)

The current state of AI adoption in HR
88% of HR leaders say their organizations have not yet realized significant business value from AI. That number is striking, given that 91% of CHROs now rank AI as their single top priority. The gap is not a technology problem it is an adoption and strategy problem. Most HR teams have added AI to their workflows in some form, but very few have moved past experimentation into real, measurable impact.

This guide is for HR managers who want to change that. Not a list of tools to bookmark and forget, but a clear-eyed look at where AI is delivering results in 2026, what separates the tools that work from the ones that don't, and how to actually use them.

The adoption gap that most HR leaders aren't talking about

AI is present but underutilized.
According to the SHRM State of AI in HR 2026 report, 62% of organizations use AI somewhere in their business. But only 11% have embedded AI into daily workflows, defined as more than 60% of employees using it daily. That is a significant divide and explains why so many AI investments feel underwhelming.

Managers experiment more than employees.
A July 2025 Gartner survey of 2,986 employees found that 46% of managers are experimenting with AI, compared to just 26% of employees. Most organizations encourage exploration but fail to provide the structure, expectations, or training needed to make AI stick. Only 7% of organizations give employees guidance on how to use the time AI saves them.

The result: wasted potential.
Workforces have access to powerful tools but no framework for using them strategically. AI becomes another tab open in the browser, rather than a fundamental shift in how work gets done.

The opportunity is real.
Organizations that have moved from experimentation to integration are seeing tangible outcomes:

  • AI-powered recruitment tools reduce time-to-hire by an average of 30 days.
  • AI automates up to 60% of routine HR tasks, saving employees five or more hours per week.
  • Predictive analytics reduces voluntary turnover by 22–28% in the first year of deployment.

Capturing this opportunity requires the right tools and the right strategy.

Why 2026 is different from every other year of "AI in HR"

1. Skills-based hiring has gone mainstream.
Josh Bersin's 2026 Talent Report found that 72% of companies are moving away from degree requirements in favor of skills-based evaluation. Gartner reports that 65% of enterprises are actively prioritizing it. The traditional resume is no longer the most reliable signal of candidate quality, especially in tech roles where the half-life of skills is just two years.

2. Agentic AI has arrived.
Earlier generations of HR AI could automate tasks or analyze data. Agentic AI can plan, act, and iterate across entire workflows without constant human direction. 48% of large companies have already adopted agentic AI in HR, with projections showing 327% growth by 2027. This is no longer experimental.

3. Regulatory pressure is real.
The EU AI Act now classifies hiring AI as high-risk, making transparency and audit trails a legal requirement. Any AI tool influencing hiring decisions must be explainable. Black-box systems are a compliance liability.

What separates genuinely useful HR AI tools from the rest

They augment judgment rather than replace it.
Great HR AI tools make professionals better at their jobs. They surface the right information at the right moment, flag unnoticed patterns, and reduce cognitive load. Tools that try to remove humans entirely create legal risk and distrust. 88% of HR leaders haven’t seen ROI largely because their tools automate the wrong things.

They generate actionable insight, not just output.
Predictive models identify at-risk employees six months before they leave, skills-gap analyses shape hiring plans before a role opens, and candidate matching highlights transferable potential. This is the difference between AI that saves time and AI that changes decisions.

They are transparent and explainable.
Employees trust AI-generated reviews twice as often when they understand the criteria. 67% of candidates accept AI screening as long as a human makes the final call and the process is explained. Transparency builds trust, drives adoption, and ensures compliance.

Top AI tools for HR managers in 2026

HireVue
Standard for AI-powered video interviews and structured candidate assessments at scale. Cuts time-to-hire by 50%, supports 40+ languages, and uses IO psychologist-vetted guides. Bias audits and deterministic algorithms ensure fairness. Ideal for regulated industries and high-volume hiring.

Eightfold AI
Built for skills-first talent strategy. Maps 1.6 billion career profiles to a skills graph, matching candidates on potential rather than keywords. Increases recruiter productivity by 50%+ and reduces diversity sourcing time by 85%. Best for large enterprises focused on internal mobility and workforce planning.

Workday
Comprehensive HR platform with agentic AI for workforce planning, analytics, and employee lifecycle management. Acquisition of HiredScore integrates AI recruiting orchestration. Suitable for organizations needing a single system for headcount planning to performance reviews.

Lattice
Focuses on employee performance and engagement. AI identifies growth patterns, surfaces feedback trends, and flags disengagement early. Predictive models detect at-risk employees six months in advance, enabling targeted retention strategies. Ideal for culture and retention-focused organizations.

HackerEarth
Covers full tech hiring lifecycle, from sourcing developers through hackathons to live technical interviews. OnScreen AI interview agent uses lifelike avatars for structured, bias-free interviews. Ensures verification and cheat-proof processes. Trusted by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Barclays, and Walmart.

Moving from experimentation to impact: a practical framework

1. Start with one high-friction problem.
Automate workflows that cost the most time or cause the most inconsistency typically initial candidate screening. Measure outcomes to justify next investments.

2. Define success before deployment.
47% of CHROs haven’t established clear AI productivity metrics. Set baseline and target improvements: time-to-shortlist, quality-of-hire, recruiter hours per hire anything trackable.

3. Put managers in the loop.
AI adoption gaps are often a manager problem. Give managers specific use cases, integrate AI into workflows, and provide language to discuss it with their teams.

The bottom line

AI will not change HR’s fundamental nature it remains a people function requiring judgment, empathy, and context. What AI improves is:

  • The quality of information available for every decision.
  • The time HR teams spend on work that doesn’t require judgment.

Organizations getting ahead in 2026 are those that select the right tools for the right problems and give teams structure to use them effectively. That is where the real advantage lies.

How to Handle Conflict at Work

How to Handle Conflict at Work

HR leaders often hear the same concern: "Small issues are turning into big problems, and teams are getting harder to manage."

They’re right. Conflict isn’t new, but how it appears today is different. Teams move faster, deadlines are tighter, and the pressure to deliver is constant. Friction builds quickly, and what used to stay small now escalates before anyone notices.

Here’s what most teams miss: the same conflict slowing them down can also be the thing that makes them stronger.

How Small Issues Turn Into Big Problems

You’ve probably seen this pattern before.

It starts with a misunderstanding, a missed expectation, or a poorly communicated decision. Nothing major, just enough tension to create distance.

That tension rarely gets addressed. Instead, it turns into silence. People stop raising concerns, avoid difficult conversations, and begin working around each other instead of with each other.

Over time, silence becomes disengagement. Collaboration drops. Trust weakens. Performance slips, and there’s no single moment you can point to as the cause. You’re left wondering, "What actually went wrong here?"

The shift that changes everything: the best teams don’t avoid conflict. They address it early. Honest communication and neutral guidance turn potential problems into opportunities to strengthen teams.

Conflict Is More Predictable Than It Feels

Most workplace conflict comes from a few common triggers:

  • Miscommunication or lack of clarity
  • Unclear roles and ownership gaps
  • Differences in work styles or expectations
  • Pressure from deadlines and performance targets

Recognizing these patterns early makes conflict easier to manage and often preventable.

Step 1: Make It Easy to Speak Up Early

The biggest reason conflict escalates is silence.

People notice issues early but hesitate to raise them. Maybe they don’t feel safe. Maybe they think it’s not worth it. By the time it surfaces, it always is.

The fix is straightforward:

  • Create regular space for honest conversations
  • Normalize feedback outside formal reviews
  • Train managers to handle uncomfortable discussions confidently

When people speak early, problems stay small and solvable.

Step 2: Act Early It Only Gets Harder

Many teams wait, hoping issues will resolve themselves. Conflict doesn’t disappear.

Small issues become frustration. Frustration becomes disengagement. Disengagement becomes attrition.

The best HR teams act early, even when conversations aren’t perfect. Early action is always easier than late correction.

Step 3: Managers Decide How Most Conflicts End

Strong HR processes matter, but most conflicts begin with managers.

Many managers aren’t equipped to handle conflict well. They avoid it, rush it, or escalate too quickly.

What works:

  • Listen before reacting. Understand what’s happening before seeking a resolution.
  • Stay neutral under pressure. Avoid taking sides prematurely.
  • Give clear, specific feedback. Vague conversations leave both sides confused.

When managers get this right, most conflicts resolve before HR intervention is needed.

Step 4: Focus on What Happened, Not Who Someone Is

It’s easy to say, "They’re difficult to work with."

It’s more effective to say, "Here’s what happened and the impact it had."

This shift:

  • Reduces defensiveness
  • Keeps conversations objective
  • Leads to faster, more durable outcomes

People can change behaviors. They resist being labeled.

Step 5: Give People a Process They Can Trust

Uncertainty worsens conflict.

Employees ask: Who do I go to? What happens next? Will this be handled fairly?

If answers aren’t clear, people stay silent or escalate too late. A simple, transparent process builds confidence and encourages early action.

How to implement:

  • Document it
  • Communicate it
  • Ensure managers know it as well as HR

Where Things Usually Go Wrong

Even strong HR teams fall into common traps:

  • Ignoring early warning signs — hoping small issues resolve themselves
  • Taking sides too quickly — before understanding the full picture
  • Relying on policy over people — process matters, but relationships matter more
  • Focusing on blame instead of outcomes — conflict resolution isn’t about who’s right

The goal isn’t to assign fault. It’s to decide what works next.

The Bottom Line

Conflict isn’t going away. How you handle it is a choice.

Handled poorly: drains teams and erodes culture.
Handled well: builds trust, sharpens communication, and strengthens performance faster than most team-building initiatives.

The best workplaces aren’t conflict-free.
They are just better at navigating it than everyone else.

Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo